who are the mods

who are the flat earthers

🙌

flat earthers are a group of ret@rds

Click on people's profiles it shows

Says the one who blindly follows authority.

Lmao.

stabilizers?

"blindly follows authority"

Why would you say that if you work for the authorities

@cocobanana regulators and above

Lol?

stabilizers are mini-mods

oh

you need a regulator to do it

LOGICAL FALLACY: APPEAL TO AUTHORITY: https://imgur.com/P7lh73P

and flat earthers are like the peopel wtih mini brains

citizen gave me the truther verified for free because he trusted me lmao

<:wonk:540283648239468554>

That's literally globe earthers.

True

ah, at least sheeple uses google chrome. thats a good thing.

Ye who cares about height anyways right

You can't get me that easily, government

@Nikk Globe Earthers are a group of people who can't do maths

I'm not that stupid

light bends

@Meowdy Yeah it bends, UP. LIGHT BENDS UP IN AIR

Sometimes debating with globe earthers is like debating with someone hard of hearing.

So hard to do it.

thats not a bend

"In fact, it can be shown that the refraction near the horizon depends mostly on the local temperature gradient, which is much more important than the local temperature itself. For this reason, all the refraction phenomena near the horizon — mirages, dip, terrestrial refraction, etc., as well as the astronomical refraction — are very sensitive to the temperature gradient; and they all vary a great deal more than does the astronomical refraction well up in the sky."
To: "It is obvious that the effect of temperature variation is decisive over the
other atmospheric factors on refraction, to the following proportions: Temperature to humidity to carbon dioxide content to air pressure = 100 : 6 : 2 : 1 "

INVESTIGATION OF REFRACTION
IN THE LOW ATMOSPHERE
By
K. HORV_,.TH
Department of Survey. Technical university. Budapest
(Received Alay 29, 1969)
Presented by Ass. Prof. Dr. F. SAHKOZY

https://aty.sdsu.edu/explain/atmos_refr/astr_refr.html

thats a lazer becoming unfocused

@Meowdy care to write a rebuttal to peer reviewed physics?