Message from @Ætos

Discord ID: 570785833897033748


2019-04-25 01:35:27 UTC  

ok

2019-04-25 01:35:38 UTC  

but i would like to see a working concave earth model

2019-04-25 01:35:54 UTC  

There sort of is one.

2019-04-25 01:35:56 UTC  

LSC's model is working?

2019-04-25 01:36:02 UTC  

Earth has to be either Convex or concave and spherical in nature

2019-04-25 01:36:02 UTC  

Almost

2019-04-25 01:36:09 UTC  

In my opinion the most reasonable earth consparisy is simulation

2019-04-25 01:36:48 UTC  

@AstralSentient alot of what Lsc says works, I don't believe he is telling the truth about what's in the core or how the solar system really works

2019-04-25 01:36:49 UTC  

For a simulation, flat earth would make more sense, no?

2019-04-25 01:36:58 UTC  

Nah

2019-04-25 01:37:06 UTC  

For a simulation nothing makes more sense.

2019-04-25 01:37:10 UTC  

simulation as in a computer simulation?

2019-04-25 01:37:16 UTC  

Is there a place I can ask questions?

2019-04-25 01:37:18 UTC  

yeah

2019-04-25 01:37:21 UTC  

sure i got you man

2019-04-25 01:37:39 UTC  

I hear flat surfaces and domed skies are very efficient for simulations of sorts.
Idk tho

2019-04-25 01:38:05 UTC  

In fact, in a simulation, the simulation could actually appear different for everyone as each individual perceives the information of the simulation differently.

2019-04-25 01:38:38 UTC  

The dome is a illusion, if we had a dome, the height of the ceiling would be different in different places unless it's a square dome? With a flat top?

2019-04-25 01:38:45 UTC  

Which would mean that the earth very well could be flat in one person’s simulation and spherical in another.

2019-04-25 01:39:02 UTC  

In a simulation, might as well be an illusion, like holographic universe

2019-04-25 01:39:07 UTC  

Exactly

2019-04-25 01:39:11 UTC  

Just pointing out the obvious

2019-04-25 01:39:14 UTC  

And everyone could have their own illusion.

2019-04-25 01:39:27 UTC  

But I don’t think it is a simulation.

2019-04-25 01:39:36 UTC  

So I don’t think everyone has their own thing.

2019-04-25 01:40:00 UTC  

the problem with a simulation earth is that the computer running it would have be so powerful that its just not possible

2019-04-25 01:40:12 UTC  

like the universe is big man

2019-04-25 01:40:12 UTC  

How do you know that?

2019-04-25 01:40:17 UTC  

Nah, it’s beyond possible.

2019-04-25 01:40:33 UTC  

and things are always happening, lots of complex things

2019-04-25 01:40:35 UTC  

We know the height of the ionisphere ad layers of atmosphere, and it's consistent, it doesn't change height to fit no dome

2019-04-25 01:40:47 UTC  

^

2019-04-25 01:41:08 UTC  

Weirdly I agree with Daniel on a lot of things.

2019-04-25 01:41:15 UTC  

That is part of why I think flat earth makes more sense with simulation
But how could we even know?

2019-04-25 01:41:20 UTC  

Just not a few of the final conclusions, lol

2019-04-25 01:41:29 UTC  

How could we know the limitations?

2019-04-25 01:41:34 UTC  

Lol

2019-04-25 01:41:36 UTC  

Exactly.

2019-04-25 01:41:57 UTC  

It's about perception

2019-04-25 01:42:04 UTC  

The dome is a illusion

2019-04-25 01:42:11 UTC  

Which means that if you can’t know the limitation, then you also can’t know the limits of complexity, so you can’t assume the simulation would be the most efficient shape.