Message from @Human Sheeple
Discord ID: 571715386907557891
Please unblock me
I really really need to talk to you rn
Too bad
Wow
Good morning
Ok so it's believed that the moon is debris of earth, and that the debris came from when a planet hit earth. Wouldnt that like push earth out of its orbit if it was hit by a planet
That is a complex scenario, they don't truly know how the moon came to be, a mere speculation
Yes ofcourse but since it's like the "official" hypothesis they must have thought of that? Like it's a genuine question from me not a statement.
lol can’t talk
Ultimately, you would have to take that up with the people running the simulations of that hypothesis, to see how it would affect orbit, because that is quite complex.
There are other proposed scenarios as well, I don't think there is a truly official catch all story for it.
GOOOD MORNING CANADA
There are things we don't know, and that is fine
*** NASA DOCUMENTS ***
NASA’s own documents…
page 2:
"In this paper, the rigid body equations of motion over a flat
non-rotating earth "
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20070030307.pdf
page 9:
For aircraft problems, the state and measurement models together represent the kinematics of a rigid body for describing motion over a flat, nonrotating Earth
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19880014378.pdf
page 11:
"The nonlinear equations of motion used in this model are general six-degree-of-freedom equations representing the flight dynamics of a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat nonrotating earth"
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88248main_H-1777.pdf
page:12
"aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over flat nonrotating earth"
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88072main_H-1259.pdf
page 108:
aircraft flying over flat, nonrotating earth
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890005752.pdf
page 126:
The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations with stationary atmosphere and flat, nonrotating earth assumptions.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890007066.pdf
page 2:
The method is limited, however, to application where a flat, nonrotating earth may be assumed.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19720012071.pdf
page 32:
Lastly, the equations of motion for the zeroth-order problem of flight in a vacuum over a flat Earth are presented.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19940020279.pdf
page14:
a) The earth is flat and non-rotating.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19790005472.pdf
page 25:
The helicopter equations of motion are given in body axes with rerpect to a flat, nonrotating Earth.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19810003557.pdf
page 13:
A model frequently used is that of a flat, nonrotating earth.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19650015408.pdf
page 19:
These equations assume a rigid vehicle and a flat, nonrotating Earth.
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88733main_H-2465.pdf
page 14:
(2) A flat, nonrotating earth
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19710018599.pdf
page2:
In our minimum time-to-climb problem, the aircraft is modeled as a point mass and the flight trajectory is strictly confined in a vertical plane on a non-rotating, flat earth.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20060053337.pdf
page 8:
the missile position in space is computed relative to a flat nonrotating earth.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20040008097.pdf
Oh
It basically assumes the earth is flat and accelerating at a uniform rate (9.8 m/s^2) and that air density is constant (1.23 kg/m^3)
GRAVITY DROP SOMETHING FLIES UP: https://imgur.com/a/0gpjvOK
Obviously NOT accelerating at 9.8 m/s^2
+1 to sheeples point
The model assumes that. 9.8 m/s^2 is an acceleration value btw.
I don't conform to your model
I don't conform to your religion
I don't accept your unproven beliefs
I don't accept your unmeasured assumptions
I am referring to NASA's aircraft model in the documents you cited
I don't follow your blind pretences
sick bruh
are u a flat earther?
I reject your system of postulates
ok
did i ask?