Message from @AstralSentient

Discord ID: 573898012376432640


2019-05-03 15:41:54 UTC  

đź‘€

2019-05-03 15:42:01 UTC  

I ttied finding a pdf or something, but I'm pretty sure there is none, because the only results are that the gyroscope drifted 15* per hour. The result is literally a yes or no question. If you think flat Earthers are faking results then you can do the experiment yourself.

2019-05-03 15:42:03 UTC  

Cool then I'm going to use the aether and I'm going to assert everything is ultimately vibrational energy

2019-05-03 15:42:06 UTC  

So the globe evidence relies on people telling a story. No data needed? Just auto belief? @Swing and a Miss

2019-05-03 15:42:32 UTC  

Do you think globebusters is lying about their own experiment?

2019-05-03 15:42:38 UTC  

why would you use pseudoscience as an actual source for fact when it literally means fake science @Human Sheeple

2019-05-03 15:42:41 UTC  

Of course there would be data collection. @Swing and a Miss

2019-05-03 15:43:21 UTC  

@Swing and a Miss maybe its faulty maybe its lies. I dont know..i didnt see it. Did you?

2019-05-03 15:43:38 UTC  

Bob was a COINTELPRO agent from the get-go

2019-05-03 15:43:43 UTC  

Pseudoscience is antithetical to rationality

2019-05-03 15:44:13 UTC  

Bassano let it slide 3 years ago

2019-05-03 15:44:37 UTC  

If you think everything that goes against flat Earth is fake, then buy a ring laser gyro and do the experiment yourself.

2019-05-03 15:44:42 UTC  

those are some big words astral

2019-05-03 15:45:12 UTC  

Follow the scientific method and you'll be fine

2019-05-03 15:45:17 UTC  

Also, if youre saying Bob is lying, then he would just make up fake results on a pdf. It makes no difference.

2019-05-03 15:45:25 UTC  

Dont need a ring laser gyro

2019-05-03 15:45:25 UTC  

where is peer review in the scientific method

2019-05-03 15:45:46 UTC  

Its obvious we arent moving

2019-05-03 15:45:48 UTC  

It is an important part to peer review

2019-05-03 15:46:00 UTC  

@

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/573898060153749524/DeepinScreenshot_select-area_20190503184521.png

2019-05-03 15:46:01 UTC  

where does peer review fit into the scientific method though

2019-05-03 15:46:03 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/573898075974795284/DeepinScreenshot_select-area_20190503184537.png

2019-05-03 15:46:06 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/573898086896762881/DeepinScreenshot_select-area_20190503184543.png

2019-05-03 15:46:08 UTC  

i think thats the “if its repeatable” phase

2019-05-03 15:46:09 UTC  

So you wont even conduct the experiment to prove once and for all?

2019-05-03 15:46:09 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/573898100498759681/DeepinScreenshot_select-area_20190503184550.png

2019-05-03 15:46:15 UTC  
2019-05-03 15:46:17 UTC  

Ring laser gyro measures light

2019-05-03 15:46:42 UTC  

Notice ZERO interferometry with open source ring laser gyro

2019-05-03 15:46:44 UTC  

Id be interested in measuring movement

2019-05-03 15:46:48 UTC  

when the turntable is not moving

2019-05-03 15:46:57 UTC  

but oh look spin it and you see interferometry

2019-05-03 15:47:23 UTC  

Evaluation is a part of the scientific method, and peer review is important to eliminate biases and faults you missed

2019-05-03 15:47:24 UTC  

actually we can see the speed of light with a very fast camera

2019-05-03 15:47:43 UTC  

Gyros dont show any movment of earth

2019-05-03 15:47:44 UTC  

We're talking about interferometry here

2019-05-03 15:47:55 UTC  

Nor do open source ring laser gyros

2019-05-03 15:48:09 UTC  

What was the measurement of the orbit with ring laser gyro? @Swing and a Miss

2019-05-03 15:48:22 UTC  

Gyros dont detect orbit