lets not get into maybes and whys

ok

so you deny any curve

its straight out flat

i just want proof either way

show me some rock solid undeniable proof

theres lots. one thing is that with this trillion dollar scam, the public generally has a good perception of NASA (a government agency), and will generally believe all things they say / claim is 'scientific'.

as well as all forms of 'science' that support their heliocentric model

if i get a strong enough telescope

what stops me

from

seeing the eiffel tower

other than other buildings

wardack

of course

the globe model has u fooled thinking u can see 300 light years away seeing doesnt work like that

@Wardak fog and other objects

i dont see fog

zzz

matt they dont understand u can see 300 light years to polaris so we should see paris from america

the globe model got u gassed up thinking u can see 300 light years

im p sure with a strong enough telescope

@jeremy i remember

many years into the future where you havea strong enough telescope to see 300 light years away

all u need is a strong enough telescope and u can see forever thats how it works lol

then my eyes wouldnt bottleneck that vision

no

300 light years

i can see 300 light years without a telescope

u dont need a telescope to see polaris

with technology strong enough deep into the future we can easily see 300 light years

i mean magnification

first of all

and resolution

u can see 300 light years today with the naked eye

we dont need any tech

nothing

ur eyes dont bottleneck how far you can see

its about magnification and resolution

ok