@R.Keating

I'd say one of those or both pictures are fake

Nasa Photoshops all of them

the camera might have been sucky

i mean, they werent the best

my camera doesnt pick up stars

cause it sucks

Sure, so they add them later while editing

and you can see faint dots

on the first

know what

ima work for nasa

and expose them thots

it won't help

Find out from the inside

yes

I'll be a sneaky spy

you'll sign a disclosure agreement

*pulls a whole wikileaks situation*

No need though, they've told us openly they do this. Their equipment often doesn't take pictures, rather it shows a bunch of numbers they can convert to images and then they color them in. They just did that with that black hole

or they'll make you an offer you can't refuse

well, the argument also goes

idk, it would still be fun to work for nasa

that they 'enhance' them for marketing strategies

i mean, who wants to look at a real black hole (which would be invisible)

me

curiosity

rather give us something that looks marketable and appealing

an invisble light? okay

Mhm, same with the beautiful galaxies, they assume they could be of those colors because of the minerals/elements they think are present.

WHO'S NEXT?? @R.Keating got knocked out

well, at least I'd know it's invisible

oof

Whoever wants to be next, Come join jc

Vc

Data script IS NOT A PICTURE

jc

😂

so you think it's worth spending trillions just to get an invisible photo

knowledge is power