not really

it fulfills its goal from the start

Someone said my name

In game

K3 is right

And I don't know how they know that I'm tom

@K3 at that point the UK had banned slavery, all of Europe did

Arabs started slavery

In the middle east

Whites ended it world wide

Other then China I guess

<:groypernt:355744055113678848>

if a nation goes out of its way to operate at the expense of slaves that are not of its nation, I don't see how it suddenly becomes hypocritical

it's not morally or pragmatically a good idea, but I don't see how it's hypocritical

@K3 because we had money

oy vey

because it is a nation for and entirely constructed for whites, but the welfare of their wealth wasn't dependent on themselves, but importing millions of other races, but banning the naturalisation of non whites

And we're way less of the population

Compare that in numbers and not %

amsalem doesn't know what Jew Humility is

Oh shit here's the retard

"oy vey"

there was a period in which further introduction of slaves was banned entirely as well

°○□■●•

I actually heard an oy vey

A few weeks ago

First one

《♤◇♡♧》¿¡

they're not citizens, and they were considered to be little more than property anyway

°¤○■□¤●•

МдяФо FцsсФ

They should've just sent them back

your prices are too high

^

No mute

Pls

it's like saying that a farming company that operates for the benefit of it's employees is a hypocrite simply because they subcontract some of their labor out

Alec

Don't do it

Don't do it alex