Message from @LOL

Discord ID: 600558512598155264


2019-07-16 05:21:40 UTC  

It worked didnt it

2019-07-16 05:21:41 UTC  

That didnt necessarily improve economy

2019-07-16 05:21:43 UTC  

Nvm

2019-07-16 05:21:58 UTC  

Address unemployment by

2019-07-16 05:22:03 UTC  

Reducing regulation

2019-07-16 05:22:05 UTC  

Btrb

2019-07-16 05:22:13 UTC  

It did improve the economy actually

2019-07-16 05:22:30 UTC  

🤔

2019-07-16 05:22:33 UTC  

Critics of it point to rising inequality though

2019-07-16 05:22:41 UTC  

Rising inequality

2019-07-16 05:22:44 UTC  

Resulting from?

2019-07-16 05:22:58 UTC  

Tax cuts

2019-07-16 05:23:06 UTC  

I see

2019-07-16 05:23:14 UTC  

Though everyone got them, the wealthiest got the biggest breaks

2019-07-16 05:23:27 UTC  

Overall though, everyone’s lives did improve and incomes went up

2019-07-16 05:23:28 UTC  

So, essentially, trickle down then

2019-07-16 05:23:34 UTC  

In a way

2019-07-16 05:24:18 UTC  

No

2019-07-16 05:24:25 UTC  

Here’s the difference

2019-07-16 05:24:51 UTC  

Trickle down refers to mainly breaks for the wealthiest, assuming that they’ll invest that money in business, and it goes down to workers wages rising eventually

2019-07-16 05:25:07 UTC  

Supply side is tax cuts for everyone at the same percentage

2019-07-16 05:25:14 UTC  

Or even flat tax

2019-07-16 05:25:14 UTC  

I see

2019-07-16 05:25:33 UTC  

Both in practice had the wealthiest taxed at the highest percentage though

2019-07-16 05:25:49 UTC  

What do you mean

2019-07-16 05:26:00 UTC  

You said tax breaks for the wealthy in trickle down

2019-07-16 05:26:45 UTC  

I did

2019-07-16 05:27:02 UTC  

Percentage wise

2019-07-16 05:27:25 UTC  

But in both cases, the wealthiest do have the highest taxes to pay in percentages

2019-07-16 05:27:41 UTC  

Supply side for example is a 5% break for all income groups

2019-07-16 05:28:02 UTC  

Percentage wise they get away with a pathetic tiny capital gains tax though

2019-07-16 05:28:07 UTC  

Trickle down is like a 7% break for the wealthiest, 3% break for lower income earners to achieve equilibrium

2019-07-16 05:29:08 UTC  

One issue about Reagan though was the deficit went way up

2019-07-16 05:29:34 UTC  

Yeah i mean it was bound to happen

2019-07-16 05:29:41 UTC  

Including debt

2019-07-16 05:29:46 UTC  

No it wasn’t really

2019-07-16 05:29:48 UTC  

Throufh all that deregulation and tax reductions

2019-07-16 05:30:16 UTC  

It’s possible to do tax cuts and reduce deficits at once

2019-07-16 05:30:26 UTC  

Yeah but still unlikely

2019-07-16 05:30:32 UTC  

The debt went up when he raised millitary spending for the arms race

2019-07-16 05:30:39 UTC  

Against the soviets