No, it's because of how their system worked, and how retarded people are

Which is entirely just a way to demonize capitalism, because this is non sensical.

But again, the workings of their system is overall pretty socialized.

Yeah

Basically

Well after Mao’s death, both socialism and capitalism properties took place. Esp when Deng was seated.

And I'm just saying that often people will point to Nazi Germany's "capitalism" to make a case against it

Which uh

Is very ironic

Makes no sense

Nazis hated capitalism

Because it didn't help their war

And capitalism itself is kind of counter productive to their own goals

True

It gave them a choice to help the war while socialism made them support the war effort

"Capitalism"

Gave them a choice

Be careful though, Sophiesticated will think you're supporting fascism<:laugh:583238348077006869>

<:kek:538084230408830987>

Short term yes

Long term no

nevermind my tag of *l i b e r t a r i a n*

Just like communism

also yeah

It's good and amazing for like 10years

seriously the similarities between the USSR and the Nazis is fucking staggering

But then capitalism is better after the 10 year mark

It is

People don't like it because it makes their argument worse

And I had laid that out earlier

They damn near had an ethnostate

Nazis, Ussr and the French during ww2

not quite like what the nazis had

Each had a party to control how the people voted by violence

Ethnostate?

But more than enough to fit the definition of fascism

they had a history of ethnic cleansings

The ussr was never an ethnostate lmao

That's why i said near

It wasn’t near it

Ok if you're referring to something like the Aryan race than yes, they didn't have an ethnostate