Or we can focus on stopping actions which threaten our lives.

Your never gonna get what you want if you continue to believe the elites and globalists are not behind all the problems we face, tis quiets obvuos i don't see you guys emphasizing what the main source of the issue is.

You know what they say. You become, what you hate. So you will get it regardless because thats what you idolize around.

that sounds lame, you will become a liberal then

you will become an atheist furry?

I think he's going to become a trans-sexual communist.

indeed

I believe in a future where we can build upon the foundation that we already have set and improve on from there. I don't think this over-exaggeration of climate change is gonna do anything but promote political agendas and intention that are far more dark than you will ever anticipate.

Here is the deal. You assume that I believe all the mumbo jumbo and crazed retards on the news who talk about green thumb day and planetary sex day and all that retard shit.

tell me that while theres no more lakes, baught up by nestle so they can bottle it and charge you for it

I don't care about political agendas.

Political Agendas are more like power agendas.

Everybody on capitol hill is power hungry to an extent.

No i just take what you say into light and then respond with a valid counter arguemnt that aligns with what i truely belive in.

18% aporval for congress.

Honestly you think they care about your life?

No, you are overcomplicating your arguments with philosophies that actually make you come off strikingly unintelligent.

What has 18% approval.

I think all people most importantly would care about their life rather than another. Honestly its all centered around our morality in this wolrd.

Congress has 18% aproval rating.

How are you gonna pass a "Green New deal law"?

Interesting

I don't know about that

But I can agree with you that egoism is a reality.

We all care about ourselves. Naturally, we can't help it.

Even the most compassionate of people care about themselves to some extent.

Moreso than others.

Listen i understand how people feel about their lives and believe that because climate is changing they somehow will believe that their life is in jeopardy.

There is a differnce between climate change and wheather.

Hurricans occuring are not apart of climate change.

If your talking about the climate then you are specifically talking about the temperature variations occurring within our atmosphere.

People who believe in climate change are statistically known to be over emotional.

And likely or little take anxiety pills to relive their distress of hopfully not dying as a result of Global Warming.

So first it was "global warming" and now they say its "Climate Change" to sound more legitimate.

I stopped being a Global Warming beliver after realizing how it became a cult. Thats where i saw the dark intentions of the far left tehcnocratic agenda. Major companies are profiting off this conspiracy as well]

@!GoldenKingship! Global temperatures have had fluctuations in Earth’s 4.5 billion year lifespan mostly due to changes in orbit and volcanic activity, so nature could be part to blame. However, placing it *purely* on ‘weather’ is an oversimplification. An increase in sea surface temperatures at 26°C between 5 and 20° north / south of the Equator are the ideal conditions for a hurricane to occur. Its the exact reason why so many of them happen over tropical seas.

*Global warming* and *climate change* are also not synonymous and wasn’t invented by some cult. Gilbert’s 1956 study was even named “The Carbon Dioxide Theory of *Climatic Change*’. While climate change refers to the changes in the global climate resulting from an increase of average global temperature, global warming is a lot more specific.

But I do agree with you on how its been hyperbolised by the media. I despise their use of dramatic music and how they pander to these overemotional individuals. Greta Thunburg is a good example of such. While claiming that she’s 0% in carbon emissions, she boarded an electric yacht constructed of carbon-fibre, which is *14-times as energy intensive* as producing steel. Said material also requires the use of *petroleum and propane*.

It would have been 6 times more efficient if her crew didn’t fly back using a bloody jet too.

its like rodney mckay said, "they were going our way"

and besides carbon fiber is way lighter, reducing fuel consumption

@CallMeTruckson Less to the point. I’m talking about the hypocrisy of Thunburg and her claim that she’s ‘zero-emission’. Extremism to the point that you’re not willing to have a multifaceted view on issues like these is problematic and just leads to a ‘fight or flight’ response from others.