When I come back do you want to talk about guitars?

Sure, if you somehow start knowing what you're talking about within those 10 minutes.

I know about guitars

Yeah, I saw how much you know about guitars yesterday as well.

<:peepok:583236153852035072>

weirdos

guitars made from trees are a source of deforestation

Says the catfish who runs around spamming his snake song.

which one

do you mean this one

Which is catchy though, I'll admit.

🎵 move like a 🐍 , move like a 🐍 , put your hands on your waist 🎵

Yes.

Love it.

yes !

🎵 move like a 🐍 , move like a 🐍 , put your hands on your waist 🎵

Aristides makes guitars with no wood, that's why I mentioned them

since you were acting like you were interested in environmental issues

Hey, how'd you get a picture of my wife?

Why are you skeptical of the consensus? @qwasi

cosby gf

Imagine drinking that sour curdled titty milk

how was that

because one day it's sunny and the next day it rains, the weather changes all the time

And?

And I know that makes Vlad mad. That's why I said it

So that’s not your reason for being skeptical of the consensus?

no

lol

What are your reasons?

I'll respond to you momentarily

busy atm

Ok.

how do I put quoted shit inside a box?

Take your time googling, lad. Nobody's pressing you.

You do ‘’>

Absolutely not.

Remove the apostrophe

> The “97 percent” statistic first appeared prominently in a 2009 study by University of Illinois master’s student Kendall Zimmerman and her adviser, Peter Doran. Based on a two-question online survey, Zimmerman and Doran concluded that “the debate on the authenticity of global warming and the role played by human activity is largely nonexistent among those who understand the nuances and scientific bases of long-term climate processes” — even though only 5 percent of respondents, or about 160 scientists, were climate scientists. In fact, the “97 percent” statistic was drawn from an even smaller subset: the 79 respondents who were both self-reported climate scientists and had “published more than 50% of their recent peer-reviewed papers on the subject of climate change.” These 77 scientists agreed that global temperatures had generally risen since 1800, and that human activity is a “significant contributing factor.”

> A year later, William R. Love Anderegg, a student at Stanford University, used Google Scholar to determine that “97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field surveyed here support the tenets of ACC [anthropogenic climate change] outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.” The sample size did not much improve on Zimmerman and Doran’s: Anderegg surveyed about 200 scientists.