also, the scaling on the red dots is purposely deceptive

with most of them being the same size

Lol what

No, the scaling is the point

The size represents the margin AND the size of the district

no, it doesn't show a clear distinction between population for smaller sizes

nope

... yes

try again libtard

Did... did you read it?

What is your claim?

that the chart is garbage and purposely deceptive

In what way is it deceptive?

read above

Each circle represents the vote margin

So if there were a huge district

That was evenly split

It would be no circle

Do you have an example of a district you think that chart shows inaccurately?

it trys to make it look like visually, the republicans had significantly less of the vote

They did

which is entirely untrue

it's just dishonest chart making at it's finest

Clinton had 3 million more votes

simple as

Like, what are you even claiming

simple as

This is showing the actual vote counts

Democrats are more concentrated, so the dots are fewer, but larger

Republicans are more distributed, so the dots are smaller, but many

If you add up all the area or all the dots, the blue would be a little larger than the red- what was the final margin?

2.1%

Was Clinton’s margin of popular victory

simple as

... yes honey, simple as

Do you understand it now?

people use deceptive charts all the time, i'm not surprised you don't see the bias

You haven’t made a claim of what the bias is

that was the first thing I did

No you didn’t

I forgot that you can't read