> Then, mere days after the final briefing came in, federal prosecutors found themselves forced to admit that for nearly three years, they had wrongly identified the authors of the handwritten notes taken by the FBI agents during their January 24, 2017, interview of then-National Security Advisor Flynn. Prosecutors had told defense counsel (and the court) that the notes written by Peter Strozk had been compiled by FBI Agent Joe Pietka, and those taken by Pietka had been written by Strozk.

Sure that should be brought up to date and made accurate

but he's still guilty of everything, fry his ass right

as long as it brings down Trump

What they are claimining doesn't really affect the stuff he is in trouble for

https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/20/all-eyes-on-judge-in-michael-flynn-case-after-weeks-of-shocking-developments/

That article seems to agree with me

It shouldn't matter, but Flynn of all people should have known better.

it's disingenuous of you to say that shady circumstances surrounding people involved with the Trump campaign points to Trump's guilt, but that the govt. withholding evidence in the Flynn case is meaningless

not only withholding evidence, but outright lying

it's not meaningless, but it's not particularly pertinent to the main issue of his charges

he did what he plead guilty to

and he of ALL people should have known better

what did he plead guilty to

lying about meeting a russian ambassador and not being a registered foreign agent

great

i dgaf

they have every communication

You might, Flynn definitely should have known better

if he did something untoward they would know

nah it doesn't work that way

bullshit

It doesn't

so he had secret meetings?

depends on how you define secret in this case, they asked him about his contacts, he purposefully lied about discussions with a russian ambassador, and the topic was a sensitive one

they already knew before they asked

there is zero chance they didn't know everything that was talked about

That's exactly how it goes, that's how you establish if somebody is lying to you

especially in counterintelligence cases

right, so if he plotted with the Russians to install a puppet POTUS, they'd know

he didn't

and they know it

you don't know everything, but if you are being tailed, your locations or if they have eyes on both subjects of a call, etc

intelligence officers around the world wish it worked the way ou are suggesting, but it's a lot of work

the idea that they didn't know the entire contents of the conversation(s) in question before asking him about them is completely absurd

I don't believe that for a second

why is it absurd that they don't know everything?

also, if they did or if they didn't that doesn't change the fact lying to the FBI is a felony

unless they stripped naked and met in a field and whispered into each other's ear while covering their mouths, they knew

also there's question of his 302's being altered

but even if they did know, he still lied