@Allan_Cruz when one side is attacked, of course they see the attack as an aggression, I don't understand what you're trying to say other than stating the obvious

on top of just the the unnecessary escalation with iran , while SOleimani was engaging in talks with KSA

Good faith? With a fucking terrorist who is responsible for the deaths of 500+ Americans?

I hate America, huh?

apparently, because to keep repeating that is stoking a fire that doesnt' need to be stoked

says you

who the fuck are you?

who are you to keep saying it over and over when you clearly dont have a grasp of the events

etc

you are just bleeting

This is just another route to bash Trump for you, plain and simple

We take bold risks.

you are deranged with hate for Trump

Trump encourages the bashing by his actions

I like his actions

If you do something worth bashing, people will bash

and if you kill 500+ Americans, Sh0t will have your back

as posted yesterday
https://truthout.org/articles/lies-about-iran-killing-us-troops-in-iraq-are-a-ploy-to-justify-war/

He was an enemy combatant, end of story

That's not accurate nor the end of the story, clearly, as more is coming out

includign Pompeo's lies about 'an immenient threat'

he wasn't an enemy combatant?

500 ? that seems a little exxaggerated lol

See my earlier statements, he was lured out in good faith via teh Iraqi PM and Trump's call

He was talking to KSA and bringing in Iran's answer

was he an enemy combatant or not?

NO

bullshit

he was operating on the guise of negotiating somethign with KSA

he was scheduled to meet the iraqi pm that day

Who were the 500 Americans he killed?

Trump called iraqi pm

Took us how long to get Osama? And he was responsible for 2000 plus

> Iran’s top "shadow commander" was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of American and coalition service members and the wounding of thousands more, State Department officials said.

but he wasn't an enemy combatant

unreal

```Navy Commander Sean Robertson followed up with an email to media outlets pushing that same line. When this writer asked Robertson for further clarification of the origins of that figure, however, he acknowledged that the Pentagon doesn’t have any study, documentation, or data to provide journalists that would support such a figure.```

see article ive linked twice

> State Department officials said.

Look at you running cover for a fucking terrorist

it's just not the case, as they lay out in the article, and even still, he was operating in a different capacity on the day of the attack