Message from @Fire
Discord ID: 663915164273344512
when rates are already near zero, there is nowhere to cut
so since there was nowhere to cut, he went negative?
the US has not done that yet, but Trump wants it. europe has, but it doesn't fix the issue
whats the issue
monetary policy is the wrong tool, but it subsidies certain groups so we keep doing it
letting the recession happen but using fiscal policy to 'catch ' people is the sensible policy, but we get ideological fights over it, alongside some savvy economic actors that like the boon they get under monetary policy
Zarif shittalked Trump on Twitter and got barred.
But im still curious as to what the issue is; you're saying monetary policy is the wrong tool, but for what?
trump tax cut was really aimed at the wrong people, and the salt deduction change was dirty
well issue is, we are inflating the current bubble longer than 'necessary' , borrowing from the future
so the national deby
debt
nah national debt isnt a problem, it's the asset bubbles
and PRIVATE debt, which is not that high for households(rate) but is bad for corporate
bond market watches know this, but it doesnt hit news much
repo market blowup is related
I don't blame Trump for the technicals, but he did bring into office the usual types of people. the financial swamp
AOC and Bernie by contrast have much better economic advisors
it's not about left or right, it's just about the mechanics of the system
their advisors understand it, the orthodox peolpe Trump brought in either dont or they do and are bad faith actors
Powell probably the latter
or else we'd have negative rates by now
I'm not a psychologist, but those who have talked about it think Trump really wanted that mainstream approval, the Goldman Sachs types
same way he craved the approval of Israel and Saudi Arabia
this idea is in line with those Bannon and Ann Coulter Frontline interviews
You guys still talking shit to each other Sh0t and Fire
...
isn't that the purpose of Discord?
To talk about shit inside a hell fire
See
love IT
Lmao
@Puerto Rican Nelson They didn’t specifically do THAT, but they did break many court rules to get Donald Trump impeached and voted to allow illegal immigrants to vote. When researching Donald Trump, they barely found anything! But they did successfully waste days of time and lots of taxpayers dollars.
And now they are impeaching him on false charges
So our view of reality is at odds. When you say illegal immigrants are being allowed to vote, do you understand the constitution only prohibits that in federal elections?
And no. If you research Trump, honestly, he is a nasty human being.
That’s what they try to convince you of. Research what Trump has done. Go to government websites instead of stupidly biased large news networks.