If he wasn't charged then there was no crime.

Manafort was charged on both

...

what

lol

That’s insane

lmao

Manafort was charged on FARA because he was lobbying for Russia

And is not how jurisprudence works

Not giving away polling data.

Inaccurate.

Or rather, the same thing

it's the same thing, mate

he was doing it

it's beyond proven

Do you dispute he gave away polling data?

holy balls

He isn't charged RE polling data, what he is charged with is failing to register he was lobbying for Russia.

No, I;m disputing any criminal activities.

End result no collusion with trump no obstruction that they found

Man you’re getting into insane conspiracy theories here

no

kenpachi

You’re going against the findings of every single US intelligence agency and apparatus

the end result is no criminal conspiracy charges

What did I say?

which does not equal collusion

And the findings of the special counsel

Says that person who thinks the 2016 election wasn’t accurate

because it wasn't

lol

The special council said there was no evidence of collusion between Trump campaign and Russia

Yes that’s correct @Vlad

What do you mean “wasn’t accurate”

I was typing too fast

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ no, it didn’t.

> did not find sufficient evidence that the campaign "coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities

criminal

charges

=/=

You literally said the election was stolen from Hillary