The special council said there was no evidence of collusion between Trump campaign and Russia

Yes that’s correct @Vlad

What do you mean “wasn’t accurate”

I was typing too fast

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ no, it didn’t.

> did not find sufficient evidence that the campaign "coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities

criminal

charges

=/=

You literally said the election was stolen from Hillary

collusion

What do you think collusion is?

It's illegal

communication between parties

@Kenpachi yes it was

and coordination

was beyond proven

You can’t rig a United States election

That's moving the goalposts

what wasn't established

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ collusion is not a word mentioned in the criminal code

is intent

no, it's not

You guys are acting as if collusion is a crime.

I've been saying the same shit

for 3 days

by now

There was communication between Trump campaign and Russia, kind of. None of it was illegal however

criminal conspiracy =/= collusion

@Kenpachi had russia not interfered, Hillary likely would have won the election

"kind of"

> had russia not interfered, Hillary likely would have won the election
No evidence of this.

they knew what content there was

they encouraged the stolen content

to be delivered

they wanted it

they didn't report it

The margins were extraordinarily slim

although they knew what it was

It doesn't matter

There's no evidence to suggest your claims.