Prove it

I refuted all his arguments from fine tuning, motion, etc.

Scroll up.

You haven’t

He then moved onto different topics.

You have the right to believe in what ever you wanna believe in. The same way i have my own, You can't justify my arguemnts being wrong if you can't substantiate the differences between right and wrong. We are poth relative regardless.

To try and shift the goalpost.

No you refused to listen them and said wrong

But failed to do that as well.

@!GoldenKingship! Wrong. I did what is called an internal critique.

I criticised your worldview from the inside, since it's incoherent.

Your arguments are very poor.

You didnt prove shit all you said was wrong and moved on

So i am going to my philosophy professor and i will ask him what his proof of God is.

@PapaPog 1) Being ontologically prior to a set with the highest cardinality is a great-making property.
2) There does not exist a set with the highest cardinality.
3) Therefore, one cannot be ontologically prior to the set with the greatest cardinality.
4) Therefore, a being cannot be maximally great.

Refute this.

@!GoldenKingship! ok

What topic are you basing your arguemnt on.

Wrong

whats all this

@!GoldenKingship! Metaphysics

The debate is about the existence of God

Was

Time to move on and debate theists who actually know what they're talking about.

Au revoir.

Wait

You clearly were missing the the whole point of the arguemnt, whatever.

You said you do philosophy right?

Lemme test you then

Blackwell companion to... NT

What is NT the abbreviation for

You clearly know nothing throttle

I recently started i'm not done with it.

Ok.

What is epistemology?

Throttle what is your definition of Philosophy?

Fascist pig

I don't have a static definition. Philosophy is hard to describe since there are so many fields.

I think philosophy is a way to use reason and questioning to understand our own existence in the wordl.

But how would that definition fit for example: Marx' philosophy

Because its my definition.

join vc