You know nothing.

Just because you claim someone loses an arguemnet doesnt mean they should have their head chopped off the same way you threatened to ban me.

Listen here bud we ain’t in the 14 century speak English

@PapaPog Knowledge is justified true belief. He believes he is right, but he cannot justify his knowledge or prove it to be true. Therefore his knowledge is false.

This is simply terminology.

He justified 10 mins ago you illiterate fuck

You just know nothing of this field.

Nope he did not.

If anything you haven’t stated shit

He failed to justify his belief or prove it to be true.

Yeah I have.

This field philosophy isn’t a field

I did prove it.

Prove how?

Yes philosophy is a field of academia. @PapaPog

You should know you studied since the dawn of time right

Pog you clearly don't know a lot.

Dude i'm done talking to you, I am trying to demonstrate my arguement and you keep saying everything is false and that existence is relative without there even being a God to begin with.

You're just embarrassing yourself here.

@!GoldenKingship! No. You're just strawmanning me since I have disproved you.

You fail to defend your argument.

It is indefensible anyways.

I’m not you deny everything without explanation if it doesn’t fit your beliefs

@PapaPog I have proved why he is false.

No you haven’t

Yeah I have.

Prove it

I refuted all his arguments from fine tuning, motion, etc.

Scroll up.

You haven’t

He then moved onto different topics.

You have the right to believe in what ever you wanna believe in. The same way i have my own, You can't justify my arguemnts being wrong if you can't substantiate the differences between right and wrong. We are poth relative regardless.

To try and shift the goalpost.

No you refused to listen them and said wrong

But failed to do that as well.

@!GoldenKingship! Wrong. I did what is called an internal critique.

I criticised your worldview from the inside, since it's incoherent.

Your arguments are very poor.

You didnt prove shit all you said was wrong and moved on

So i am going to my philosophy professor and i will ask him what his proof of God is.

@PapaPog 1) Being ontologically prior to a set with the highest cardinality is a great-making property.
2) There does not exist a set with the highest cardinality.
3) Therefore, one cannot be ontologically prior to the set with the greatest cardinality.
4) Therefore, a being cannot be maximally great.