Message from @Otto
Discord ID: 630872567367860254
You might need to read from the start
Ok your not my dad.
To understand the jargon
Ok I can advise you to read
Once you've read it tell me your thoughts
Is fallout 4 a good game? Is it worth $30?@Deleted User
Hmm.
Feser's up-to-date versions of Aquinas Five Ways
first way right?
No, not for that amount.
@!GoldenKingship! Yeah
@Gоd Get it off cdkeys.
Like everyone says if god exists who created god
If god was affected by time and space he wouldn’t be god
:/
Atheists believe that the universe came from literally nothing
personally I think that’s bullshit and that’s why I believe in a creator
just a thought
@⭐ trunks ⭐
At the very least, implicit atheism states that there is no sufficient evidence for a God to exist
Again the answer to what created the universe is "we don't know"
But saying that a God definitely exists is wrong
Yeah
We know nothing
Just like saying god definitely doesn’t exist is wrong too ; )
That's implicit atheism for ya
<:yus:538083968881524747>
I still believe in a god, no matter what
You can't destroy the conception of God.
And you can't destroy the conception that there is no God.
Even athiest have a conception of God
@!GoldenKingship! This is actually a type of the argument I was referring to when I said "the argument where god is supposedly proven by his definition"
There really is no way of winning an argument on whether God is or is not Real.
You see, the argument is fallacious because it uses the predicate of a subject to prove the existence of that subject
Whats a higher power than god?
There is too many variable within space time that eludes us from determining God's existence because no matter what he is Eternally abstract from reality.
Continue with rational science lol.
Everything goes together anyways.
Even if there is a god, we don't really have much reason to believe that it is anything other than a small element of our section of the universe
The universe itself is infinite
You can't use science to prove God existence. Its already said that he is abstract from reality so the only way to philosophically proof his existence is through reason and understanding of the world we live in.