Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 644891145209643021
those generations will be unruly regardless
as racism decreases and they become a majority their crime rates remain idle
Do you acknowledge the trauma of poverty and systematic abuse is passed down through generations?
yes, the chinese for example
they weren't allowed to have property
when blacks could
and were targets of racism
nonetheless
they have a higher average income
and less crime rates
Blacks owning property tells me you're not approaching the issue in good faith.
they weren't in the 1920s?
the chinese came to the US with nothing, were anti social due to governmental oppression and were illegaly enslaved
and now where are they?
A number of them did. The more enterprising managed to set up Black Wall Street in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Then white folks burned it to the ground. It made no economic or strategic sense for them, the stark reality was that blacks could never be allowed to be too successful in a white man'sworld.
are they not allowed to be successful?
the same happened to the chinese
when their farms were taken from them
Well anyway I'm heading to work
@Puerto Rican Nelson Have a good day
@Feed Me Satan 👌🏿
there's crime troubles within american chinese culture (Triads), but the bigger picture is that immigrating across the pacific ocean to the US is expensive. So the only asians that make it over here happen to already be realtively well off in their native homeland, and plenty more have their children sent here to take advantage of american Universities.
In other words, the chinese weren't dragged here in chains and sold in market squares.
For 400 years.
they were sold
by other chinese
a few where, most weren't.
also false, are you telling me that supposedly affluent Chinese people would migrate to the US in order to be enslaved
check how they were treated in california
Some had to suffer constructing railroads, while others began enterprising in San Francisco. The history of generational wealth of the Chinese compared to blacks in the US is day and night.
enterprising ?
they weren't allowed to have property
while the blacks were
the blacks at least had the legal prospectus
even when they weren't allowed to have property
some of them actually created large businesses through 3rd parties
such as native white men and even black men
I cant find anything about the Chinese being prohibited from owning property https://www.archives.gov/research/chinese-americans/guide
the geary act didn't allow naturalization meaning they couldnt own property
this gives a good insight
Within a few months of the implementing the Act, Chinese in the U.S. began organizing to resist the enforcement of the law. The heads of the Six Companies, the San Francisco branch of The Chinese Consolidated Benevolent Association, proclaimed that the Chinese in the U.S. ought not register, but rather contribute to a fund for hiring of lawyers to fight the law on the ground of unconstitutionality. The effort was overwhelmingly successful (only 3,169 of the estimated 110,000 Chinese in the country had registered by the April 1893 deadline),[10] yet newspaper coverage of the protest reported Chinese as being slaves to doing whatever The Six Companies told them to do.
So the law didn't really do what you describe.