Message from @Vlad
Discord ID: 678286142805639168
Well if you do believe in a god that is indeed omnipotent
Why do I have to?
That god cannot exist since omnipotence itself is logically impossible
I didn't say you have to
i said *if*
But you're positioning the argument as if I had to.
No I'm not
What if I don't believe in an omnipotent god?
Then my argument doesn't apply to your god
Okay, so how does your argument prove that there is no God?
I should have specified that it disproves the idea of a christian god
Since the christian god is omnipotent, and omnipotence is logically impossible
Why can't God transcend human logic?
My logic?
He can transcend your logic
I am simply asking you questions.
Ask
I am not making claims.
You left without answering.
Ask
I don't have million of free time
If god does exist above logic, then there would be no way to prove his existence logically, so any argument for his existence would require empirical evidence
I don't know.
Yeagh
Yeah what?
So, what's your question
> If god does exist above logic, then there would be no way to prove his existence logically, so any argument for his existence would require empirical evidence
The requirement for empirical evidence follows the same logical trend.
Why can't God transcend it? Why can't he exist without being proven?
If you make a positive claim you have to back it up with some sort of proof or justification
That's answering questions about who would be correct in a dialogue.
Why can't he exist without being proven?
How can you say something exists without any proof or justification for it?
I am not saying anything. You're telling me that he does not exist.
And your argument is that in a discussion