Message from @!.MESSIEH
Discord ID: 679503707356004362
Most dont i whould say
Second, @Cobra Commander Under different circumstances, that rate can change.
@Yusa the majority of people centuries back believed blood letting was an effective medical treatment for most things.
Ad populum.
How exactly can that change?
I need to go now, my brain doesn't want to argue any more tonight, but will have fresh evidence and a fresh brain in the morning
dunno about the last bit
Imagine if instead of god
People put faith in themselves instead
Post made by the satanism gang
Also, I will be willing to debunk more of your theories tomorrow to prove to you that evolution is false and that there would have to be a God.
Also most may believe in creation in some form, a majority of people (at least here in the US) aren't as resistant to understanding how evolution and stuff works
Yeah even the Pope agrees evolution is ok
that puts a good billion christians on our side
You've debunked nothing, you can only make assertions with literally zero proof.
This has been nothing but 5 hours of logical fallacies and whataboutery
Yeah
Now im just gonna make this clear i dont hate religion, its actually an area of interest for me
But i live by the motto: science before belief
Hell you can believe what you want, just be honest that it's a *belief* at least. Don't act like you know something is 100% true if you can't bring up any evidence.
Yeah my point exactly
reason can inform faith, but faith exists without it by definition.
Just realized i made a typo
Typing is hard
> You've debunked nothing, you can only make assertions with literally zero proof.
That's how I feel about everything you've said.
> you can believe what you want, just be honest that it's a belief at least. Don't act like you know something is 100% true
Same goes for you. You are believing in life coming from non-life. You can't repeat it and you can't guarantee me that it's true. Although you are apparently 100% sure that it is. I've given proof and methods that suit me and you have given proof and methods that suit you. Tomorrow I will have some extra proof to make a triple-logic punch. Full of links that are NOT from wikipedia or Answers in Genesis. I mean dude, just admit that life coming from non-life is a belief and not an indisputable fact.
The experiment he gave did not prove that life could come from non-life
Despite the fact that I have said that I didn't claim that the origin of life is 100% determined and that I referenced evidence for that?
He just proved that chemicals could change
Exactly
Into life
Life is chemicals
@Cobra Commander Yep. It's not even past the theory stage. It's just that, a theory. And a very unscientific one
Just think about that until tomorrow
gradual process: inorganic molecules > amino acids/organic molecules > RNA/Protenoids
A theory is a hypothesis with enough evidence to be considered fact by definition...
jesus christ *learn* about the things you try to argue against before you debate
Alright, well then both life coming from non-life and a God creating the universe could be considered theory
Equal theories
What evidence supports God creating the universe?
I'm glad you asked
Thats not the bible
oh lawd
You need *evidence*, not assertions.
Autism mode is about to be engaged
Geuss he gave up