I think you meant 200,000

@Sentient23 Where do you get the idea that only 200,000 jews were murdered in the holocaust? Theres no real peer reviewed evidence and studies that say 200,000 jews died

As a result of the holocaust

bruh i was joking

<:lol:583236542580129825>

i dont care about the holocaust but i personally dont believe it was 6 million

Ight

It was actually more than 6 million

12 million estimated

Well, that's what they mainly say now-adays- wait shit no that's overall


SCRATCH THAT!

Lmao

@Sentient23 what was your question?

It wasn't a question, it was more of a statement

I said, that women shouldn't do politics, and that this is outlined in the bible and the Church teachings.

@Sentient23 👍

Eh here's something I genuinely can't get to grips on

Let me first state that I mean no disrespect to anyone who didn't in a religion in the first place, you believe what you want, couldn't care less.

So, I'm very interesting in the psychological aspects of alot of things, and I would like to know,


What makes people with faith in certain religions, so.. devoted? I mean there is no proof that thing or person happened or existed apart from a book or a scroll, and as I once said at rather immature age, why trust something some high guy drunk on gasses or smoke, over a scientist from today, on what grounds do you justify faith in God, goddesses etc

GG @Anomaly, you just advanced to level 1!

oh my....

So many ridiculous misconceptions that i dont know which to tackle first

I agree honestly.

My own arguments are idiotic

First of all, just by reading your last paragraph, i can deduce that you have a skewed definition of faith. Faith doesn't mean what todays atheistic fanatics proclaim it means. Faith, is defined as outlined in "Foundations of Catholic dogma" :

**"But as a science of faith it seeks by human reason to penetrate the content and the context of the supernatural system of truth and to understand this as far as possible. St. Augustine expresses this thought in the words: “Crede, ut intelligas” Believe that you may understand (Sermo 43, 7, 9); St. Anselm of Canterbury, with the words: “Fides quaerens intellectum” Faith seeking to reach the intellect (Proslogion, Proemium) and: “Credo, ut intelligam” I believe that I may understand (Proslogion I); Richard of St. Victor with the words: “Properemus de fide ad cognitionem. Satagamus, in quantum possumus, ut intelligamus, quod credimus” (De Trinitate, Prologus). Let us hasten from faith to knowledge. Let us endeavour so far as we can, to understand that which we believe"**

Secondly, this notion "there is no proof that thing or person happened or existed apart from a book or a scroll" is obviously ridiculous. The proof isn't a "book" its the content, and the contextual basis for the said book. What do you even think the bible is? This one book which originated by a single person writing everything down from their memory? No, its a bunch of historical accounts pf phenomena witnessed by thousands of people at the time, compiled into a single Material book in reference to what they deemed was "relevant" to Jesus and his background.

Scientists can never, and have never, made any valid claims against religion. Religion is inherently spiritual and thus immaterial. Science is a material methadology which seeks to establish the facts of the mater. Therefore, it can never reach religion since religion is immaterial and spiritual. I can justify god in a seperate argument but I'd like to clear these misconceptions first.

I wouldn't call them idiotic, its just a lot of misconceptions

Socialist

lol

What are you 11?

And find it funny

I’m white

Fucker

well you're acting like one nonetheless

Are u a female thot?

If so

May I cheat on my GF for u?

lmao ok simp

Oi safety my guy, commit super shush

go simp elsewhere

Fucka

@Anomaly u black?

Prob

Nah mate

I commit niether

oh

Ye