Message from @kurae.
Discord ID: 688598938454065199
my point is, you won't go to a majority Muslim country because you would be treated as a second class citizen, that's what happens when Islam is the majority
Aisha was the wife of Muhammad
not of allah
im speakin abt allah here
lol
I'm not proselytizing for Islam. I will not advocate Islam. But I will advocate for those who follow it and wish to live free and contribute to American society.
pojanfpojnafbpjnefpojaen
omg
LOL
Muhammed is the prophet
some sources put the date in her teens; but both the date and her age at marriage and later consummation with Muhammad in Medina are sources of controversy and discussion amongst scholars.
dont fabricate facts @qwasi
and ik
I'm not fabricating anything
stay woke guys
I just know my experience with my colleagues
this is what happens when you walk into a debate unprepared and end up looking like a clown
And the history I have studied
no research, no facts, nothing, just opinion
what is what happens? You quote Wikipedia and think you pwned me?
lol
oh well then, it must be true
It's controversial
so let's say she was 13 and he was 50+. Still cool?
nobody knows when muhammad was betrothed to Aisha
lol
> Among those who want sharia to be the law of the land, in 10 of 20 countries where there are adequate samples for analysis at least half say they support penalties such as whippings or cutting off the hands of thieves and robbers
> In 10 of 20 countries where there are adequate samples for analysis, at least half of Muslims who favor making sharia the law of the land also favor stoning unfaithful spouses
> in six of the 20 countries where there are adequate samples for analysis, at least half of those who favor making Islamic law the official law also support executing apostates.
wow, so progressive
wow, we owe them so much
let's be more like them
Islam is right about women
right?
https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4481625/Norris_MuslimIntegration.pdf?sequence=1
> "the analysis demonstrates that the basic values of Muslims living in Western societies fall roughly half‐way between the dominant values prevailing within their countries of destination and origin. This suggests that migrant populations living in [...] are in the process of adapting to Western cultures, while at the same time continuing to reflect the values learnt through primary socialization in their original countries of origin."
> "living within an Islamic or Western society has a far stronger imprint on values than individual‐level religious identities, or indeed the effects of an individual’s education, age, gender, and income."
> "Our overall view of these findings is that Muslim migrants do not come to Western countries with rigidly fixed attitudes; instead, they gradually absorb the values prevalent in their host society, as assimilation theories suggest"
> Evidence from the WVS/EVS (1999‐2001) indicates that religious traditions have historically shaped national cultures‐‐ but today their impact is transmitted mainly through nation‐wide institutions, to the population as a whole. Historically Catholic or Protestant or Islamic societies show very distinctive values, but the differences between Catholics and Protestants and Muslims within given societies proved relatively small.
> Nevertheless, substantial national differences are apparent, and the gap between Muslim and Western societies is particularly large. [...] Do such cultural differences necessarily lead to tensions or even clashes? No. Under high levels of existential insecurity, xenophobia and intolerance are particularly intense and likely to lead to violence.
ill send an image in general
is a harvard study 'fake news' as well?
as DrYuriMom said - this isn't advocating for islam, but rather the majority of their followers
na, she said "we owe so much to Islam"
in western countries, at least