Bulge detector 😳

GG @bruv, you just advanced to level 8!

basically, only way to monitor this

So if we say we ban all people whonhave malicious intent from female bathrooms

We will also ban lebians
But having men inside female bathrooms is also not right

But also gay man have the right to use female bathrooms

Its so much

It'd be far to complicated to do that

No that's the stupidest thing I've heard

Its complocated

We'd need at least 4 restrooms to do this "perfectly"

Divided by sex not identity

Simple concept

Agreed

So true but what about bisexuals

Nomwe need 5 bathroomz

What ever sex they are they use the bathroom specified

I'm saying to completely avoid abuse as much as possible we'd need to use multiple bathrooms, but this is unrealistic. Just go off of sex

Exactly

https://tenor.com/view/magic-shia-labeouf-snl-skit-fingers-gif-4860090

Its so ckmplicated since theirs alot pf facets and valid point of views in the argument

That's why you just draw a line and fucking board that shit down

Can't let stuff like this get too complicated, if you consider every single possibility it would be impossible to pass anything.

Points
-men can easily go inside womans bathroom with a wig
-gays and trans have the right to use female bathroom
-getrid of everyone who have malicious intent inside female bathroom
-lesbians also might have malicious intent
-transsexuals after transitioning they can still be considered men and have male secual needs

See that's too much to consider in order to completely pass this policy

If tarnsitioned transexuals have male sexuals needs
Would that make them ? Not allowed

You're making this too complicated

It's not possible to go off of a tiny percentage of situations because then nothing gets down

But we cant let people with malicious intnet get inside the bathroom

Thats why we have female and male bathroom in the first place

Simple as this, penis=male, vagina=female and that's how the situation is dealt with

But we cant have a systme check genitalia cuz that perversion

Dude, there is no possible way to deal with every single small chance of a mishap

You need to understand that we need to go off a super majority of situations

For example, by that logic I could say we should eliminate public restrooms entirely because people could have malicious intent

So what your saying is that we use discription to classify male and female

GG @dandelion, you just advanced to level 10!

Pretty much, just draw a simple line

People who use bathroom
But with the cost of men getting inside them

Look, the same thing can happen now no problem so it doesn't matter what we do

Well yeah ofcourse

So we can't keep looking at these tiny amount of cases

The best solution is the solution that we have