Message from @Billcat
Discord ID: 575326854693519370
yeah
if you dont want it
I would wager that the vast majority of people 12+ know that penis + vagina = baby
I think that's a pretty shitty stance to have, mostly because of how callous you sound michael
not really
It's one thing to argue bodily autonomy and another thing to say "abort that shit"
whether its a life or not
having sex (protected or not) ≠ consent to having a baby
I do not value a fetus in the first trimester
It doesn't matter if it's a life, it matters if it's a potential life, once that potential is created it is, in my mind, immoral to remove it
Robbing a store ≠ consent to going to jail
Well then jerking off is wrong
So when does life start then by your standards?
But going to jail is still a consequence that will occur
False comparison
How so?
Both are an action you are choosing to involve yourself in and, whether you like it or not, that action will have a consequence outside of your control
And no, because jerking off does not produce a baby. Sex produces a baby
The sperm is a potential child
A woman having her period is a waste of potential
The egg is dropped
Yes, but only if it is combined with an egg, and vice versa. 50% of a zygote is not a zygote, and if left unimpended sperm or egg on its own will not created a life
but it is "potential"
So then what if your absolute intention is to not have a kid??
It's ironic that you accuse me of creating a false comparison and then immediately make a false comparison
Just pleasure
Then go through the proper steps to prevent a pregnancy
Do you eat eggs
"It doesn't matter if it's a life, it matters if it's a potential life"
we eat chicken children
Yes, and sperm is not a potential life. No matter how much somebody jerks off a baby will never begin to form from it
lol
isnt that basically like eating a human child
So, that chicken has potential and you just aborted it
yea
True lmao
Are you trying to talk to me or talk past me, komrade?
wait what i said sounds messed up, sorry
I've explained to you why your analogy is incorrect but you keep repeating it, which is very confusing