yeah

the inconsistency or not

Then I showed that the potential life being preserved damage the already existing life present

No, that was the weakest point you made during the entire discussion

your morals = killing a living being is wrong. science = fetuses aren't living. all that proves is killing fetuses is NOT immoral

there ^^

How so??

If, theoretically, potential life is enough, then harming somebody's social or economic status is not justification for ending it especially when this isn't even the case

oh so potential life is not life?

No? I never claimed it to be, the only reason I participated in the "is it life" discussion was to humor the conversation

science doesn't impact your morals, it impacts the actions and decisions you believe to be moral or immoral

Or are they synonymous under your definition. As in you hold potential life equal to life itself

I think whether scientifically or not a fetus is alive is not important because, morally, I view that potential as the deciding factor.

But earlier you said, "current life has precedent over potential life" so it does justify it

I specified medically

so you think that potential of life will lead to life and when its life we cant kill it?

Then you're limiting it to specific factors which can harm a life. You're ignoring the social and economic damages of having a kid prior to being able to sustain it

Which then ruin both lives

Does this mean you value potential life less or equal to actual life? @Billcat

I'm saying the social and economic factors are not relevant because carrying a baby does not equal raising a child

basically for billcat, he values morals over science. for us, we value science over morals, even though the science does fit our morals.

well thats how i interpret it anyways

yea but you carrying a baby and not aborting will lead to harming the mother

or other people

So then to not raise it you put it up for adoption which I showed is currently a shit place for a child to be

Not quite. I think that science and morals are two separate things that work in tandem, not aagainst each other

why dont we talk about outliers now

Is a shitty place better than dead? @Komrade Kam

you explained your views on the majority

No

depends

Not at al

Then why even say that?

KomradeToday at 11:03 AM
So then to not raise it you put it up for adoption which I showed is currently a shit place for a child to be

They're not dead

Would you say abortion is murder? BillCat

They never were alive to be dead

murder of potential life

So if you never exist it doesn't matter

See, that doesn't logically add up, because we were just now discussing the moral nature of the debate

dude billcat. address the outliers. in cases of abusive relationships, minors getting pregnant, and rape, what are your views on abortion @Billcat