Your second example of equality is not a correct example.

That or its too ambiguous

Is correct example

When they discuss the wage gap

They took female ceos

Take male ceos

What prominent leftist have used those definitions

WHOA FEMALE CEOS ARE BEING PAID LESS

REEEE WAGE GAP

That's a liberal thing not a leftist thing

Implying liberals arent leftists

Define Leftsist

A real leftist worth his or her salt would be center right

-define leftist

**leftist**: Similar to a liberal in that this represents [left-wing] viewpoint on the [political spectrum], but self-identified leftists are typically more [anti-capitalist] than liberals. Sometimes used by right-wingers as a derogatory term.
*[A lot] of leftists I've [talked] to really don't like [Hillary Clinton].*
*(<http://leftist.urbanup.com/12826770>)* *9 more results*

More anticapitalist than liberals

LOL

@Techpriest That is still a incorrect example of equality

the only spectrum liberals are on is the autistic

Based

Not incorrect

Absolutely correct

How so??

Imagine wanting to be paid the same

When u take maternity leave

And demand less hours to care for ur kids

They never take hourly wages into account

Youre using a wrong definition to argue your point

Only your yearly salary

Equality is bad

Equity is good

Your example that women want to be paid the same because of the same job field

is not equality

Is equality

None the less you're still bashing the definition of equality and equity

Imagine u have 50 engineers

because there are alternaitve variables that make it inequal

25 f 25 m

equal pay with inequal variables is not equality

If every female was getting paid less

Instead of providing a definition you provided an example based on some random idea