@$iffyßoy come back to bed, my little bitch

Suppose we met a race of creatures—fairly clearly non-rational animals—that was very different from us: on Mars, say. And the question arises: are these creatures sexed? and if so, can we distinguish male and female? We need to think now how we would go about finding out these answers. We would not do it by investigating their psyches, nor even merely by just looking at (or cutting up) individuals. We would try to find out how they reproduced and what was the role of the different organs of the different individuals involved in reproduction. Thus, sex is a biological and teleological notion. Anything else which is called sexual is so called ultimately because it has some relation to this process, to these organs.

sex and gender correlate with each other

Yea but they are not the same

Sex is what I wanna fill your anus with

its clear that the majority are libtards

Sex is reproductive organs

I'm a tard for you

and socialist/ communists

Gender is masculine of feminine

Or*

If we observe that the members of a species reproduce asexually, then we rightly conclude that neither male nor female exist in that species. But if we observe that two are required for reproduction to occur, we rightly conclude that the species reproduces sexually by the union of the two. We name these two types differently—as male and female—based upon the roles they play in reproduction. Such is why Aquinas held to a binary account of sex: “The distinction of the sexes is ordained in animals to the generation which occurs through coitus.” If human beings had no ordering to reproduction, or no sexual reproduction occurred, not only would one have no concept of gender, there would be no biological sex in human beings.

u guy arent smart enough to have a civil talk

you harrass and disrepect ppl

respect*

suck your mothers u irrelevant pieces of shit

Yea cuz we have heard the same shit 10000 times

Whats the updates

And no one disagrees with you

@woggu I love you rape me

theres a real deabte going on

There, thus, can only be two biological sexes for human beings. In syllogistic form, what I am arguing is this:

Biological sex is defined in relation to the roles played in sexual reproduction.
Sexual reproduction involves only two, namely, male and female.
Thus, biological sex is only two, namely, male or female.

Bro

This is sex

Not gender

Oooo

Defects occur in nature, but defects imply a norm from which they deflect. A castrated man is still a male; a female with a mastectomy is still a female. The fact that one is born with ambiguous genitalia does not do away with one’s true sex. That it is hard to identify someone as male or female does not mean one is neither. Identical twins are hard to distinguish, but they are still distinct persons. Epistemological problems need not entail ontological ones.

This is a game of semantics @$iffyßoy

not science

Siffybitch blockked me

Bet

They are 2 different things

I personally dont give a shit how many genders there are

I think you are the only tard here m8

if you want to be called a t rex

i call you a t rex

Dude gender is stupid

Right

We should revert back to distinguishing people based on their sex instead

Yes