you have no evidence to back up what you are trying to say

so it must not be true

There is only up and down

Prove to me that's not the case

Just one link

Give me a link

i just want you to show me proof

pls

I just want you to show me proof

ok

Pls

ill look for something

There's only up and down

wait

a bit

No proof? Okay, only up and down it is

I thought a big thought

Smarter than everyone else

Cosby he is looking something up now stfu

He's spending a very long time to show me even a single link that there's more directions than up and down

I'm sorry that he is looking for a source and it takes time

I don't have high hopes

@tripp

Alright we're several minutes into our realization that there is only up and down

I think we're all much smarter now as a result

@Allistair Onedollar faster

https://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2013/09/14/why-i-dont-defend-the-sex-versus-gender-distinction/

here

read

i was reading the article that this person made

now

go ahead and gimme somthing

@TrippieCock

and this thing about there is only up and down, dont make much sense, how does that connect to something like gendaer and sex, and saying that these two things are the same, so are you saying that it would be wrong to say that left and right dont exist becuse u feel like it, but in reality it does, and sex and gender are the same, and the only reason why they are different is because someone in 1949 said that these were different, and they said so without any actual evidence or prooof

so please, what is ur ecidence and these are different, except from this one french person 1949 who said so

@Dr.Cosby dumbo

Okay, so you've had almost an hour but can't provide me a single link proving that there are more than just up and down directions @Allistair Onedollar

I think that matter is settled then

As for gender vs sex, you posted a link to some guy's blog where he has an opinion piece in which he loosely proposes that maybe it's okay for forms to say "gender: male/female"

I'm about 95% sure you didn't even actually read the thing yourself, but if you did I'm still not sure you're intelligent enough to understand why it's completely useless as "proof" for the "point" you're trying to make.

This is why I'm not eager to be friendly with every dipshit that comes around with "smart thoughts". You waste everyone's time and contribute nothing of value. Intellectual dishonestly, spreading false information, and not contributing well-reasoned or well-researched content. Congrats