That is entirely contextual to the cases

It was an example

If you can prove intent based on racial motivation the yes

The claim here is that a lower murder rate makes you safer. It does not.

I can prove historical motivation and political motivation

Which then goes into racial motivation

Lower murder rate in your demographic rather

Explain demographic

Area demographic

Or ethnic demographic

Political demographic

In this case, transgenderism

Okay, I'm confused

Word fix please

Either way this article is not enough information to make a claim

A claim for what?

Transgender murder rates and trends

How transgender individuals are murdered because of "hate crime"?

Effectively yes

All I am saying, is you cannot make a claim on general safety based on one article based solely around hate crimes

Single variable analysis is the pitfall of tons of misleading statistics and faulty conclusions

That is my claim.

<:1010:591246312863956992> now that works

Also you don't have to hit a certain quota for something to be considered a hate crime

It's motivation based

Correct

Absolutely agree with that definition

hate crime just sounds like a redundant term to me

I mean

The only hate crime I can describe today is Venezuela and WW2

Venezuelans hate Americans

Nazis hated Jews

I'm not saying that there isn't hate crime going on in other countries

I'm just saw that statically these areas during these times will lead you being killed just by one factor

Rednecks hate muslims, russians hate muslims, chinese hate muslims

A lot of people have a lot of hate

Right but if a single person is killed for a single reason in a developed country than that is a hate crime

By definition

@RoiKadmon you're better at debunking follow ups than me can you help me out

@RoiKadmon you also forgot to give yourself more roles (look at mine as a cheatsheet for what you should add)