Message from @JesusHand
Discord ID: 671578915885809684
and it has sources of its own
asuch as you know
THE OXFORD DICTIONARY
wikipedia isnt valid
yes it is
its a very valid source
and they did not create the oxford dictionary-
they sourced it
ffs
okay then name one scholarly paper
in the article
that uses a wikipedia link
in their bibliography
its not used as a source
okay
so its not a valid source then?
they have sources in the description
those are the sources they use
okay then why dont you use those sources
the wikipedia
you dont use an article as a source
you can
actually
name one scholarly article using washington post tho
because right now
okay i will
As a source of a main source
ok
What seems to be the problem here
let me help
he thinks sharia law isnt that bad
Ok, that seems pretty extreme
Who
Do you really believe Sharia isn't "so bad"?
Black oger needs to be caught by Police
Or is he trying to trick you
well hes making up shit of why its a myth
of how bad it is
I am here to do justice