That only shows more incompetence

yep

nationally

i think every person has a worth

1 person infects maybe 10 to 20

and they can infect also up to that numbers

so 200 people and that isnt enough?

200 people is in germany almost an entire school

the tests other countries were using in mass had only like an 80% accuracy

the u.s. wouldn't use those tests

bad argument

nope

for real

That is a very bad argument

These are just more problems we have

the new tests they are rolling out have high accuracy

i would use it still if 80% could be still usefull

and now they are testing more than any other country

soon

if you can gues 4 of 5 people correct its still better than nothing

If the CDC had followed WHO protocols we would have made a successful test to begin with

yup you could have

false negatives probably do more harm than the correct positives

nah

yep

They don’t do more harm

how should they

They isolate people

yep

if someone gets a false negative, they go out

and they have it

ye and if they not test

they still go out more

False negative is usually lower than false positive

yep

If they have a false negative, think about how many of the other people were marked as a true positive for comparison

That saves many more lives than that person who got a false negative

yup

> really but at the start it wasnt
Insurance companies waved it pretty early.

That’s if you’re insured

yup