Message from @Will not respond
Discord ID: 575111138539208704
That's why many ancient civilization had a "grain standard," as opposed to gold, with grain even being the currency at times
Wasn’t that the same time they used gold coins as currency
lol watch this UK:
@McBacoon Seem to have a thing against the UK, aye?
😘
Ye mate
Why is that?
Don't see any valid reason unless you're going to invent an insult?
I know the way to fix the min wage debate once and for all
lets here
it
Side A: Raise Min wage. Side B: But then the cost of everything would go up
valid points
but
The answer is to set a cap on how much more CEO's can make than their employees
you know back in the day they made 30% more
nowadays they make 300%+ more so
interesting
the answer is to cap it so they can only make like 50% more or something so then they won't lose profit by raising the wages
so the more their employees are paid the more they get paid, the less their employees are paid they less they are paid
I feel like there would be loopholes
like would this include bonus' and stipends?
no but you could only allow a certain amount of those per year
per person
Interesting for sure
if that could work its a shame we would never see it. That would be lobbied into the dirt
Like take the Walton family for example they make 25,000$ per MINUTE most people make that in a YEAR if they are lucky. So make them not make such a significant difference
then buried 6 feet under
yeah
but we could try
true shit
its the only answer that I have found
trying never hurt anyone
dont question me on that
Thats cool
I wish i had data on that
I think it would work super good just would need to factor in a lot of things and positions and sort all potential loopholes and riot and stuff LOL if congress gets bought out
I love it
yeah thats a great idea
@Will not respond if you cap the % on how much CEO-s can make more than avg staff, then you would have no CEO-s as it takes more money/time to learn business economics for 4+ years than it is to get a high school diploma