Im saying China doesn't practice globalism

but by your own definition they do

-df globalism

**globalization**: [In a nutshell], the [integration] and exchange of ideas and goods globally. Hence the name, globalization. It benefits the middle class and especially the rich and powerful, but has hurt the poor and [powerless].
*Question: What Is The Truest Definition Of [Globalization]?

Answer: [Princess Diana's] death.

Question: How come?

Answer: An English princess with an Egyptian boyfriend crashes in a French tunnel, while in a German car with a Dutch engine, driven by a Belgian who was drunk on Scottish whisky, followed closely by Italian Paparazzi on Japanese motorcycles; treated by an American doctor using Brazilian medicines.

This is sent to you by an American, using [Bill Gates's] technology, and you're probably reading this on a computer that uses Taiwanese chips, and a Korean monitor, assembled by Bangladeshi workers in a Singapore plant, transported by Indian lorry-drivers, hijacked by Indonesians, unloaded by Sicilian longshoremen, and trucked to you by Mexican illegals.*
*(<http://globalization.urbanup.com/1181166>)* *9 more results*

yep

by this definition

china is globalist

its pretty clearcut

American ideas arent integrated into Chinese goods

Neither are the European Union

the more you repost your own definition, without realising that it contradicts your own viewpoint, the dumber you look

My definition have been the same

and it contradicts your stance on china

There has to be a global integration of goods and ideas

so you look very dumb

And rn there isnt

what ideas do the americans share in the chinese market? @Green Syndicalism

@GoldenGail3 for a start, china adopted america's perspective on small and medium businesses

they only have 150 SOEs now

every other business is private

I guess no one remmebers Chinese literally forced Leica to disown a professionally made ad because it showed China in a bad light

for a second, china has a joint venture program, which makes sure that american businesses in china must share management and ownership with chinese people

and then leica was censored

thats a form of idea diffusion

thats just authoritarianism

More like American business must be owned by ONLY chinese

thats got nothing to do with trade

Whatever American influence in China must be controlled by China

no, americans can own 51% of the stock of a company based in china

Meanwhile the nations that preach globalism welcome foreign businesses with open arms

you realise theres different degrees and types of globalism right

Wow 51%

Not even 100%

Whats the point

so you think there needs to be PURE INTEGRATION for it to be globalism? that doesnt match any definition of globalism out there

Based

literally your own definition disagrees with your argument

<:JFK_smiling:601284245524185113> now ur getting it

True globalism have never been practiced

Which is why nations dont preach globalism but the big bankers do

you just abritrarily redefined globalism to be something that isnt matched by any other definition or practise of globalism ever