what?
"well, why do you test our leader"
it is a correct sentence
We're discussing economics
not your submission complexes.
Go bother someone else.
well you lost your edge
@Green Syndicalism You cannot delineate "social science" from "science". It's like trying to delineate "car" from "vehicle".
Social science is a type of science.
plus I was calling you a troll and set up an example in which you were a troll
but the ENTIRE POINT of labelling a social science *is to delineate it from the normal sciences*
No,
it's to specify what kind of science it is.
if there was no need to delineate it
What you're saying is not making any sense.
*it wouldnt have the 'social" prefix*
_the ENTIRE POINT of labelling a car is is to delineate it from the normal vehicles_
yes
actually
... what the fuck is a "normal vehicle"?
It's to delineate it from the _other_ vehicles, neither can be called "normal"
we have different words used to delineate them from other similar concepts
Indeed.
thanks bud ;
"Social science" does not preclude "science".
It specifies a subdomain.
Exactly.
Social isn't a prefix, it's an adjective.
It adds a quality to specify what kind of science.
its a delineation to separate it from the original/actual sciences and the reason we need to do that *is because its a type of science which uses different methodologies and epistemologies than science in general*
Demonstrate your hypothesis.
are you familiar with the free market toy model
toy model?
I most likely am familiar with it,
just not the English names.
the free market is nothing but a toy model
but okay its made up of plenty of different moving parts
first
you need a market demand curve
I know.
