Hard science

<:kermit:591248635220721674>

Imma watch

Stop shitposting, Katze Miaulitzer, you troll

well it is true

@Green Syndicalism "social science" is, by definition, a science

you even debated the owner on his own rules

and thereby someone who practices it is a scientist

@Katze Miaulitzer ... yes, you fool

Of course I did

theres a reason we delineate social science from science dude

dumbass

Yes, you are.

Most economists dont treat it like a social science I feel, which is definitely a flaw

You are indeed a complete dumbass.

*they use fundamentally unscientific methodologies*

@Katze Miaulitzer Being the creator of something allows you to define your intention in creating it,

it does not mean you are omniscient regarding it.

well, why do you test our ruler

They just kinda figure out how to make the economy more the most effecient

Like Friedman

Someone who writes a sentence can determine unilaterely what he _meant_ saying it,

He can bring you into existence and yeet you out of it

but determining what he actually means is something else entirely, as people make mistakes

Especially people who fail at spelling "you"

_our ruler_

lmfao

I knew you were a troll.

what?

"well, why do you test our leader"

it is a correct sentence

We're discussing economics

not your submission complexes.

Go bother someone else.

well you lost your edge

@Green Syndicalism You cannot delineate "social science" from "science". It's like trying to delineate "car" from "vehicle".

Social science is a type of science.

plus I was calling you a troll and set up an example in which you were a troll

but the ENTIRE POINT of labelling a social science *is to delineate it from the normal sciences*

No,

it's to specify what kind of science it is.