Message from @Sh0t

Discord ID: 638378244147642378


2019-10-28 14:04:06 UTC  

like, you clearly havent read any serious amount of market socialism

2019-10-28 14:04:29 UTC  

Oh i have, actually arguing about it right now, cockshott and such

2019-10-28 14:04:45 UTC  

yea? ive read more than 10 books on this

2019-10-28 14:04:49 UTC  

and im telling you

2019-10-28 14:04:51 UTC  

*youre wrong*

2019-10-28 14:05:09 UTC  

so i dont give a shit if youre having an argument with someone on it

2019-10-28 14:05:14 UTC  

its uninformed

2019-10-28 14:05:23 UTC  

I wasn't really making a wrong or right statement there, i was more giving my opinion about the 'red line' between one or the other

2019-10-28 14:05:32 UTC  

and its an incorrect redline

2019-10-28 14:05:37 UTC  

ill prove it

2019-10-28 14:05:54 UTC  

suppose there exists 20 different "regions" in a country

2019-10-28 14:06:03 UTC  

it's pretty good. if the means of production(capital) aren't nationalized and if individuals can buy and sell shares in companies, etc, it's not reallya socialist country

2019-10-28 14:06:04 UTC  

and each region has a socially owned bank

2019-10-28 14:06:15 UTC  

there are at least 20 socially owned banks

2019-10-28 14:06:28 UTC  

socially owned can be in a gazillion forms, is a joint stock company considered 'socially owned'?

2019-10-28 14:06:30 UTC  

or a credit union

2019-10-28 14:06:34 UTC  

now in this system, you can have a stock market for the trade of securities between socially owned banks

2019-10-28 14:06:48 UTC  

if individuals can have property rights in stock, i think thats' the dividing line

2019-10-28 14:07:03 UTC  

socially owned as in, the people of that region have equal, or near equal, levels of shares in it

2019-10-28 14:07:08 UTC  

and they cannot sell the shares

2019-10-28 14:07:13 UTC  

it's not a technical argument, it's arbitrary but i think it represents a big difference since having property rights in stock versus not being able to have them is a big deal

2019-10-28 14:07:35 UTC  

but this is literally a socialist system which has a stock market

2019-10-28 14:07:39 UTC  

so....

2019-10-28 14:07:41 UTC  

youre wrong

2019-10-28 14:07:43 UTC  

that's not really a stock market

2019-10-28 14:07:50 UTC  

that's a socialist govenrment pretending to have a stock market

2019-10-28 14:08:02 UTC  

how the fuck isnt a market of securities being openly traded by all banks not a "market of stocks"

2019-10-28 14:08:06 UTC  

its not a socialist govt

2019-10-28 14:08:08 UTC  

holy shit

2019-10-28 14:08:13 UTC  

these banks arent owned by the government

2019-10-28 14:08:13 UTC  

you said "they cannot sell the shares"

2019-10-28 14:08:17 UTC  

yes?

2019-10-28 14:08:17 UTC  

that's a big deal

2019-10-28 14:08:20 UTC  

it is

2019-10-28 14:08:23 UTC  

and its not govt owned shares

2019-10-28 14:08:30 UTC  

the banks arent government owned

2019-10-28 14:08:36 UTC  

theyre socially owned

2019-10-28 14:08:51 UTC  

whatever the arrangement is, if they can sell and 'dump it' they aren't really participating in a stock market

2019-10-28 14:08:57 UTC  

if they cant

2019-10-28 14:09:04 UTC  

and i said the people cant sell the shares they have of THEIR BANK

2019-10-28 14:09:11 UTC  

the shares of the stocks CAN BE SOLD