it LOOKS the same, but it's not the same

by this standard definition

the model i just gave is a stock market

stop making yourself look like a dumbfuck

if you can't sell out completely, it's not the real deal

but you can

its a market

including the holding banks

with an order book

the 'social banks'

what

<:uwu:576463885716946945>

the shares of the banks arent on the stockmarket

the shares of other companies are

The Jews run the banks

then they serve no purpose and you might as well skip the 'social bank' and let people own the stocks individually

thats such a dumb fucking take i cant believe it even came out of your mouth tbh

like how can you think specialist investors are equivalent to an individual normie?

<a:E_:610580048231268362>

what's the purpose of the 'social bank' in this arrangement, besides being an extreme layer of paperwork

<:jew:297512475127971841>

well it depends, in some cases, there is no difference at all

have you ever fucking heard of a mutual fund

Yes, but you can exit a mutual fund

and that causes problems for the fund, depending on how big you are

and this is a mutual fund you cannot exit

that's not a mutual fund then

that's something else pretending to be a mutual fund

thats not my point

think harder idiot

why do people put money into a mutual fund

instead of investing it themselves

various reasons, sometimes hoping the fund managers are better than they are, sometimes for tax reasons or they have to as a vehicle, etc

mutual funds cover a huge range of activities

so which one do you think a socially owned bank would perform the function of

think hard

You can exit from mutual funds anytime on payment of exit load except closed ended mutual fund and tax saving (ELSS) mutual funds

Sped

That depends on the goal of the socially owned bank

why the fuck would a normie be able to invest their money better than a specialist investor

and what 'socially owned' really means