Message from @Chionophile
Discord ID: 696138692552556664
false dichotomy /dilemma
peace corp part of the problem or part of the solution
not only 2 outcomes
suppressed evidence
most energy drinks are mostly water
equivocation (always involves ambiguity in terms of definition)
ambiguous term used in the argument that does not always mean the same thing throughout the argument
only man is rational
no man is a woman
no woman are rational
man has changed the first meaning human the second meaning a human male
amphiboly (always involves ambiguity in sentence structure and meaning)
lack of pronouns or reference
you have a screw a bar and a hole tighten it
different from hasty generalization
particulars to a general statement
attribute is distributed (about each and every moment)
Composition
parts to whole (class statement)
fleas are numerous (class statement)
fleas are small (generalization) ( each and ever member of the term fleas are claimed as small)
Division
whole to parts
the whole car is heavy so all of the parts are heavy
Formal logic
Categorical Logic
Distribution of terms
quantifier ( how much)
Subject term
copula (to be, is, are)
Predicate terms
Quantity Subject Copula Predicate
A All S^d are P^u Universal Particular
E No S^d are P^d
I Some S^u are P^u
O Some S^u are not P^d
^D distributed
^U undistributed
Quality Affirmative or Negative
Existential Import
A All S are P
|
V
O Some S are P
Hypothetical
A E
X
I O
Contradictory Square
Aristotle: all propositions have existential import
Boolean: Existential import
a: all s are p
e: no s are p
I: some s are p
o: some s are not p
conversion : switching the subject and predicate
a: all s are p → all p are s not equivalent
e: no s are p → no p are s equivalent
I: some s are p → some p are s equivalent
o: some s are not p → some p are not s not equivalent
obversion: change quality, replace predicate, with term complement
a: all s are p → all s are non p equivalent
e: no s are p → no s are non p equivalent
I: some s are p → some s are not non p equivalent
o: some s are not p → some s are non p equivalent
Contraposition : switch subject and predicate, replace both with compliments
a: all s are p → all non p are non s equivalent
e: no s are p → no non p are non s non equivalent
I: some s are p → some non p are non s non equivalent
o: some s are not p → some non p are not non s equivalent
im not chad im incel <:grinding_this_discord:591219324593766403>
O9A are all degenerate nerds
Im monky
<:sega2:695481554083774484>
<:sega:425135428132274178>
<:sega2:695481554083774484>
Nicve vlog faggot
how do i decrease my ejac
upper penisula
anyone have that video of a black midget running around on all fours in a bar
Summers almost here. Get some protection
hahah
oh man...
god... damn
fuck...
superfelony
i have a hard time coming to the realization that everyone is an advantageous vulture waiting for vulnerable opportunities
and i wont ever change from being a naive retard
and that's a bad way to view the world
little bit of advice when it comes to text arguments, we can all see what is said, and in what order it is delivered. You started it all, and continued to argue and fight when it was clear you were caught in doing so. Next time you want to try and start some shit, don't do it here. This isn't a shitposting server.