Message from @christiam
Discord ID: 684932201984557094
I'm surprised that isn't more of a popular sentiment, but I'm willing to listen.
<:fashtag:670898094292074556>
No welfare for those who aren't married, simple solution.
No whoring around then.
It's babylonbee but it's still funny
based and 80s pilled
Subsidies for married individuals who have children. We need a pro-natalist policy.
@christiam system is ass backwards, if you're married you can't collect welfare.
Marriage doesn't solve the long term problems Chris
nothing you're saying is wrong
it's just not politicaly feasible
Because that just encourages more people to become lazy and promiscuous because they know there's no repercussions to it @bighmmmm
as of right now
It only solves our problems
Not those outside us
promiscuity probably can't get any higher
> Subsidies for married individuals who have children. We need a pro-natalist policy.
@christiam we need to get our demographic situation under control first. I don’t want to be paying diversity to have more kids.
Sterilizations for single welfare recipients
people are maximizing degeneracy
Been that way since Obama signed the legalization of gay marriage
Start deporting*
barring that tho
Deport the 3rd Worlders we have. Including Tyrone.
is abortion okay?
Is infanticide okay?
Give Tyrone Georgia bama and Florida tbh
Not really, abortion promotes promiscuity.
it makes me sad; I don't like it
Deport them there
Build a wall
Deport them to Haiti.
If you give into the eugenics argument at what point is it still wrong to kill that person because they're not as beneficial to society?
Promiscuity makes people statistically unhappier. Abortion allows "mistakes" (again and again).
The solution has been known for a while.
Would it be right to massacre welfare recipients because they don't contribute to society?
sure
gloomer moment.
no
> Would it be right to massacre welfare recipients because they don't contribute to society?
@Fawx what race are they?