Message from @DarkErminia
Discord ID: 685683087010431021
the problem is that life-outcomes of children from lesbian couples are *worse* than single moms
Traditional family structures are of the upmost importance.
from gays, actually slightly better than traditional households
but you cant just ban adoptions from lesbos
I just sort of want to see liberal heads explode when we get a woman in office before they do. They screwed over all the women in the primaries because they be shitting their pants that their candidate would lose to Trump (>implying they would win with any candidate).
But I think the left just cares about electing women because they're a woman, fuck their qualifications and policies.
I personally hope the GOP elects a woman not because she's a woman, but because she actually represents what GOP voters want. I mean, there's a lot of talent in 50% of the population.
hold on imagine president alex jones 2024
Im going to show you where it's dark
alex jones would be funnier as secretary of defense
But have no fear
or vp
To be honest, "traditional households" is a vague term. A true traditional household is a nuclear family structure.
Oh no
No
There's something inside you
And it's hard to explain
They're talking about you boy
And your still the same
Most traditional households are extremely degenerate, I wouldn't be surprised if gays raised better kids than the average wine mom.
let's do one better. president arnold schwarzenegger. curb china by literally going over to beijing and strangling xi jiping.
or better yet an even more cursed timeline where jimmy carter tries to run a second term
really, the data seems to point to the fact that after 6 months, mothers dont matter
who can come up with the most cursed 2024 candidacy
households with abusive fathers, and even single dads, have kids that do lightyears better than single mom and lesbo households
Studies have repeatedly shown that conservative families are happier than liberal families, so it also depends if gay households are more effective than conservative households.
what do you blame for the obvious decay of civil society
Corporations, celebrities and liberalism.
But only one of these things controls the other two.
19th amendment
you hit it on the nail with celebrities. degenerate pop culture brought us here, but i think theres two more things at play.
Women belong in the kitchen
the 19th leads to no-fault divorce which leds to the collapse of the western world
rise of non spacial communication (the internet is great, but its isolated us as well) and opiods.
women can do what they want, but they vote based on Muh Feelz and for State power to protect and supply them
as a block, individuals should be taken as such
Honestly, I agree @DarkErminia. But it's clear that companies with massive resources are using this newfound influence to spread their worldview.
i think they dont believe the shit they spew, but they spew it to control the masses
opoids are a result of the family falling apart and womens increased unhappiness with life in the workforce vs home, leading to mens unhapiness and opoid usage
It really begs the question, why so many companies talk about climate change activism, why are they so feminist, why do they support mass immigration?
lets count the logical cobtradictions with their logic...
Climate change activism is inherently globalist, because it's a global investment. Feminism destroys traditional family structure, and dual-income households generate more profit.