Corporations, celebrities and liberalism.

But only one of these things controls the other two.

19th amendment

you hit it on the nail with celebrities. degenerate pop culture brought us here, but i think theres two more things at play.

Women belong in the kitchen

the 19th leads to no-fault divorce which leds to the collapse of the western world

rise of non spacial communication (the internet is great, but its isolated us as well) and opiods.

women can do what they want, but they vote based on Muh Feelz and for State power to protect and supply them

as a block, individuals should be taken as such

Honestly, I agree @DarkErminia. But it's clear that companies with massive resources are using this newfound influence to spread their worldview.

i think they dont believe the shit they spew, but they spew it to control the masses

opoids are a result of the family falling apart and womens increased unhappiness with life in the workforce vs home, leading to mens unhapiness and opoid usage

It really begs the question, why so many companies talk about climate change activism, why are they so feminist, why do they support mass immigration?

lets count the logical cobtradictions with their logic...

Climate change activism is inherently globalist, because it's a global investment. Feminism destroys traditional family structure, and dual-income households generate more profit.

As for mass immigration, that also infers a globalist worldview.

>climate change
>supports nations like china, which pollutes a metric fuckton.

>feminist
>supports sharia law

like how do they expect gays/feminism and radical muslims to mix well

They don't outwardly support China, but they use China as their workshop. Very hypocritical.

its like trying to mix the nazis with the jews

its not going to end well

And you're right, they say that Muslims are fine in contemporary western society, when in reality, Muslims are the most traditional religious groups.

question: do you think islam could hypothetically be reformed, martin luther style, or is it always going to be like this?

Islam is a topic I know about but only in regards to immigration. As for their religious doctrine, I wouldn't force a liberal worldview upon them.

Needs a New Testament like revolution. Theres too much structural shit deep in that doesnt work with other religions

Islam is inherently more violent, but applying western ideas to Islam wouldn't be good either.

They have their own traditions and customs, they should keep them. But they should be less violent. That's really about all I can say.

I think it could be reformed to better suit the west. But I'm against trying to change anyone's religion without their consent, so that would have to happen naturally.

Instead of stoning women, just shame them. It's much more effective and less barbaric. And from a Christian perspective, murdering women for sinning is morally wrong.

They set a terrible example by stoning women, because it engenders the idea that women should live in fear.

That's unhealthy.

Isn't there some UN declared human right they would be violating there?
Oh wait, the UN is a bickering globalist council controlled by authoritarian nations who can't do shit. I forgot.

The security council is a complete joke.

One nation can veto anything.

(Laughs in Israel getting more human rights condemnations than FUCKING NORTH KOREA)

The only nation who should have that power is us.

We deserve it, we created this modern world, and the world owes us.

Speaking of which how much money does Europe still owe the US through the Marshal Plan?

their books says Stone the Women, so they have to

I think they weren't loans, but the US basically rebuilt Western Europe.

But I'd rather have no UN than a UN controlled by America, simply because the institution would drift from American influence over time.