Message from @Gappateeカルタゴ
Discord ID: 689534443014455385
When things like independent and vox telling me he was not a socialist. I will doubt. They been proven to be fake news over and over again
if hitler was actually socialist why wasnt his system socialist and why did he kill commies
Partly because the socialists were internationalists and he was not, partly because he planned on genociding Slavs and colonizing Eastern Europe
Well for one in Europe back in the day, a lot of different socialist groups were infighting for power back then.
> the ~~socialists~~ jews were ~~internationalists~~ jewish
And that. Many secular Jews are given to communism for some reason. Eg the rosenburgs
its almost like jews invented Communism or something
They probably did
marx was a jew
We learned nothing from the 20th century. It was not “Fascism, Communism, bad, liberalism good”, it was “Dictating conformity to the ideas of man on the global level is bad”
And Marx was a theistic satanist
communism, if it isn't authoritarian, literally fucks over jews though
@Gappateeカルタゴ I'm from Europe, his party was a socialist org, the former leader of the DAP left the NSDAP in the late 30's because the party was going to the right from his point of view. Party still identified as a socialist org in the 40's. Beside that its a different kind of socialist system, not a marxist system but a pure racist base socialist system!!!!
> theistic satanist
yeah, jewish
Lol Marx was a foul human being on a personal level
wtf you believe in something you must believe the exact same things other people who believed in it happened to believe in!!
wood doors!
Are hard.
wait what are we talking about
Some dum bass ideology, like “socialism” or something
Ummm, no, but you’re advocating for a system generally ushered in thru revolutions. In revolutions the radicals always seize control when the moderates can’t deliver. Read your Crane Brinton
based radicals
1776
@VicariousJambi where is my tea tax!
you get 25% of your income stolen by the government. I think its in there somewhere
Interestingly enough the American Revolution is actually notable as a “conservative revolution”, it borrowed enlightenment language but was ultimately a Middle and upper class vindication of existing rights rather than a middle class rejection of the reigning ideology and decadent ruling class
I think at this point we’re just T-posing on a sad pinko and shitposting
I too can use verbose language and creative diction to not make a point.
Imagine if feminists tried revolting over women’s rights
that would be cool i think
That would be a lot of dead
The point is that the American Revolution was not ideological like many other ones, therefore less dangerous to order
theyre too busy defending the rights of mentally ill men who want to be women
but dangerous radical revolutions are based
Kinda not tho
@DontBreadOnMe don't care. Where my tea tax <:knifepepe:624681482979377202>
We yeeted your gay tea tax.
I will invade if no give me my tea tax
Because what Bread is saying, is that the american revolution conformed to already present laws. Most radical revolutions would change laws.