Message from @Donk
Discord ID: 695521555542835260
pretty sure most people's wives were like 16 in the 20's lmao
the treaty of versaille idk if it had a lot of jewish influence; I think he just blamed the jews for the loss of the war. The influence in that treaty where the victors wanting germany to pay them back for all the fuckin money they spent during it
most of the infighting factions back then were just versions of socialism with different colored bows on top.
individual freedom = slippery slope to leftism
individual freedom is a meme, true
>The ideaology of a nazi is to get behind a cause blinded
You got no clue if u think this
slippery slope is a fallacy. I see what you mean though; but properly educated, people wouldn't fall into that death trap but the idea that they might is the cost of freedom
slippery slope is objectively real
yes
It's not a compelling argument against individual freedom. The far-left argues the same thing. "Freedom and self-determination are bad because people might choose to be a fascist, so we have to have total control."
Holy shit im tired
See yall later fuck sanders
>but properly educated, people wouldn't fall into that death trap but the idea that they might is the cost of freedom
The strongest base of support for the Nazis were the middle class, so they were educated
the lefts idea of freedom isnt actually freedom.
it had popular support among the medical and science fields, because eugenics and race were considered that
isnt the trans stuff just the objective case of individual liberty gone too far
I don't mean educated in the sense of science/medical I mean educated in history and understanding the pitfalls of societies historically
they were in a massive depression and the country was in complete turmoil lmao
and yes that is the cost of individual freedom; but I feel the cost of anything else outweighs some idiot believing they should be the opposite sex
most of history is dominated by authoritarianism
liberalism only started gaining traction in the 20th century after WWII
democracy also only started becoming popular in the 20th century
but what good has individual freedom been so far, the end result has been trans kids and weirdos all over the streets
proper liberalism is 17th-18th century
in a world where everyone is so concerned about "muh individualism" theres no concern for the collective society
we live in a very unique era compared to the rest of history
I am ignorant towards these fields but from my life experience and the experience of others i've came across; taking ownership of your life and accepting challenges seems to be the best outcome rather than being dependent on a higher power
I agree
the best route to embrace this seems to be individual freedom
I am accepting and open to different opinions towards this
Someone who wants power over you would be inclined to disagree.
It depends what you want more of in the world
individual freedom in my eyes has been the biggest reason we went from trad society to degenerate globohomo bs
my great grandfather who stormed the beaches of normandy always told me 'people have the right to be stupid'
its not individual freedom its nihilism and post modernism
Being compelled to use a made-up pronoun by the state is not an outcome of individual freedom.
i don't think any of our ancestors were fighting for todays america
we spit on our history, because we want to be more in touch with minorities than our own people
zach you should read patrick J buchanan's death of the west
no they werent, but eventually with individual freedom and the government system we have its bound to end up warped eventually; we just need to educate the populace that this stupidity (far left) isn't something small and needs to be understood as a plague to society
very easy read, short book
People should have the right to do whatever they want in private, provided they don't harm another. It's the overreach of using the state to compel the rest of us to participate in the delusion that is objectionable.
no they shouldnt lol