You still sell more during war

you need conflict to test the weapons

GG @That guy, you just advanced to level 3!

You need conflict to show your arms are effective

You need conflict to show your combat superiority

Sure you could say that weapon manufacturers get more money by selling their weapons but lets look at it in a different way

You need conflict to retain your word as a political position

you need conflict for so many things

That there are more sides to this than arms factories

Give me ur side

Enlighten me

There is much more to be earned through trade in the free market than an armed conflict

Free market 😂 😂

So it would benefit one side but...

Not the others

In fact it might hurt their profits if two nations go to armed conflict

Bs

They will sell to both

Of course it does,the stronger country wins lol

Companies that makes the arms make a killing

His argument does not even make sense

If Afghanistan joins the global free market and starts trading its good, the entire world benefits more than if it burns to the ground

Does the US and Russia want Afghanistan to do that tho?

Trade what opium

Course they do

you simply can't start trading without approval

no they don't

Theg both went to war with it why would they want it

They*

Do you even think Afghanistan matters at all?lmao

If you mean the cold war there was actual reason for that than wacky theories

Wacky theories?you don't even know who owns the economy

Do you know anything about central banks?

Oh man and you sure know how an economy works

Rich old white men

Yes because every rich old white man earns money through conflict

The Rothschild family owns every country's central bank but 3

What 3

Iran North Korea and I think Syria

Sounds about right

show boo proof