the diseases happened largely because of the famines

mostly from unsustainable cities

NO

JUST STOP

STOP

when a crop is low for that year and cities need a lot of food you get a famine

simple as

in the high middle ages began the privatisation of the commons and open field system and the creation of these early "capitalist" farms were far more productive

they produced more food with a lower number of workers freeing up the serfs and making them economically obsolete

well they basically just grew much more food than they needed, that's the only difference

THEN *because of* more food being produced with less workers, the result was large waves of urbanisation

yeah and then you need more food

it's a death spiral

this more producitve agricultural system and larger populations in the towns

omg

NO

NO

grow what you need and keep the population stagnant

big brained

the malthusian trap is where the population increases because of serfdom where it can only sustain a certain size of population

that results in lower living standards and leads to a famine and THAT is the death cycle

what YOU ARE A PROPONENT OF IS THE DEATH CYCLE

THE FAMOUS DEATH CYCLE

GO ANDLEARN WHAT THE MALTHUSIAN TRAP IS

YOU'RE LITERALLY A PROPONENT OF WHAT IS ESTABLISHED FACTUALLY AS THE DEATH CYCLE

the only way to live is in harmony with nature

what i'm discussing is what BROKE the death cycle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malthusian_trap

a

why are you so opinionated on something you know nothing about?

and serfdom is not living in harmony with nature lol

how has that excess population worked out for us today? Not looking so good.

maybe we should have just let people starve occasionally

that's a whole other conversation, but so far preferable to living as serfs lol

so what happened is that agricultural enclosure stopped this cycle of famines and starvation

and that's when this happens

so you're saying agricultural enclosure is destroying the world

see the chart on the top left?