it has lots of hurdles to jump
homogeneity is a benefit to a flourishing society, not a guarentee. you can have a shitty country with one ethnicity
The English brought law, order, and borders to a confused masss of tribes.
take most african countries, islamic countries, china for example
China is the only strong society of that list.
i dont mean strong, i mean good as in virtuous, fully functioning
If the one ethnicity is shit
Still china is the best of vitue and functionality.
It will be shit
and also you can have a non-shit ethnicity and still have a shit country (sweden)
This is true
it's not a guarentee by any stretch
As a baseline you need racial homogenity
From there you can still fuck it up
We need something to last for 1000 years. All else has failed and led to our destruct.
i suppose there are other systems that could work with a more diverse population
just not libertarianism
or direct democracy
How about based on fascism, but fluid with the times.
Well crap, these guys from that thread?
Fascism is historically the best system/worldview
Why should a government always be the same type of govt? We should set in place a process of transition .
I'm sure it would still work today
i was asking what indianaisfull meant
I'd have to respectfully disagree with y'all there
Sprinkle it with monarchy, sometimes democracy, whatever is needed.
how do you sprinkle fascism with monarchy and democracy
Except as tools
I want feudalism
Ultimately there's no place for either
My idol is Charles Martel
Then it would no longer be fascism
Martel was the real kebab remover
if you want god tier feudalism do anarcho capitalism and wait 20 minutes
o o h
Divine right of kings