Message from @diversity_is_racism
Discord ID: 259053123019079680
WHITE POWER 1488
out of 500-1000 direct ancestors i have from the early 1700s i only found a fraction of them documented and 1 black man
i'm tired of typing the slash
@bb22 back of the bus! jk
my point is that when you have 500-1000 direct ancestors from 300 years ago the odds of them all being 100% white are slim to none, thus "one drop rule" being ignorant
see the links in that gab post
facts disagree
i wouldn't take it too seriously though
that makes you 0.0025% african or something like that
i wonder if people are angry that i, as a white man, have default access to white women
yes
"where da white women at?"
okay im going to open that link you sent and we're going to talk about it in detail
wooooord up niggaz
have fun
it's fascinating stuff
youll have fun with me lol
we have fun with everything
we're going to talk about it because i know how these tests work
half-troll, half-activist
that's how the tests work?
the website you sent has to do with associating certain genes locations based on where they occur most commonly
how does that relate to fact that "one drop rule" is a bunch of bullshit?
"Understanding the genetic structure of human populations is of fundamental interest to medical, forensic and anthropological sciences. Advances in high-throughput genotyping technology have markedly improved our understanding of global patterns of human genetic variation and suggest the potential to use large samples to uncover variation among closely spaced populations"
if you read the abstract of the scientific study theyre citing, the purpose of the study was explicitly to gather data from particular geographic locations in europe and map the relative genetic similarity of the people living in those areas as opposed to people further away from those areas
the one drop rule is not bullshit, within a certain number of generations
yes, exactly: most people breed with those like them
thus the random breeding thesis is bullshit 😃
so the whole purpose of this particular study was basically to measure minute markers of how inbred people are in given geographical locations in europe today
"most people breed with those like them" -- im not disputing that
if you think im disputing that then youre going to be talking past me for a long time
this is why only 5% of whites have admixture
this is the actual article in nature that theyre citing
i'm bavarian, i have leiderhosen and i eat schnitzle.
you scandinavian, diversity?
german, czech and english
i mean diversity
for the record im mostly scottish by direct lineage, also german and english